Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31568505›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Modeling spatial variation in density of golden eagle nest sites in the western United States.

Jeffrey R Dunk, Brian Woodbridge, Todd M Lickfett, Geoffrey Bedrosian, Barry R Noon, David W LaPlante, Jessi L Brown, Jason D Tack

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey R DunkDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-9272
Brian WoodbridgeU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Todd M LickfettU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Geoffrey BedrosianU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Barry R NoonDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
David W LaPlanteNatural Resource Geospatial, Montague, CA, United States of America.
Jessi L BrownDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, United States of America.
Jason D TackU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Missoula, Montana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to contribute to conservation planning efforts for golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the western U.S., we developed nest site models using >6,500 nest site locations throughout a >3,483,000 km2 area of the western U.S. We developed models for twelve discrete modeling regions, and estimated relative density of nest sites for each region. Cross-validation showed that, in general, models accurately estimated relative nest site densities within regions and sub-regions. Areas estimated to have the highest densities of breeding golden eagles had from 132-2,660 times greater densities compared to the lowest density areas. Observed nest site densities were very similar to those reported from published studies. Large extents of each modeling region consisted of low predicted nest site density, while a small percentage of each modeling region contained disproportionately high nest site density. For example, we estimated that areas with relative nest density values <0.3 represented from 62.8-97.8% ([Formula: see text] = 82.5%) of each modeling area, and those areas contained from 14.7-30.0% ([Formula: see text] = 22.1%) of the nest sites. In contrast, areas with relative nest density values >0.5 represented from 1.0-12.8% ([Formula: see text] = 6.3%) of modeling areas, and those areas contained from 47.7-66.9% ([Formula: see text] = 57.3%) of the nest sites. Our findings have direct application to: 1) large-scale conservation planning efforts, 2) risk analyses for land-use proposals such as recreational trails or wind power development, and 3) identifying mitigation areas to offset the impacts of human disturbance.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEaglesFemaleHumansMaleMidwestern United StatesNesting BehaviorNorthwestern United StatesPopulation DynamicsReproductionSouthwestern United States

Identifiers

PMID31568505
PMCPMC6768475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.