Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31568504›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Mapping Schistosoma mansoni endemicity in Rwanda: a critical assessment of geographical disparities arising from circulating cathodic antigen versus Kato-Katz diagnostics.

Nicholas J Clark, Irenee Umulisa, Eugene Ruberanziza, Kei Owada, Daniel G Colley, Giuseppina Ortu, Carl H Campbell, Emmanuel Ruzindana, Warren Lancaster, Jean Bosco Mbonigaba and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence Mapping ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nationwide Remapping ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicholas J ClarkUQ Spatial Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-3301
Irenee UmulisaNeglected Tropical Diseases and Other Parasitic Diseases Unit, Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Eugene RuberanzizaNeglected Tropical Diseases and Other Parasitic Diseases Unit, Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Kei OwadaUQ Spatial Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Daniel G ColleyCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Georgia, United States of America.
Giuseppina OrtuSchistosomiasis Control Initiative (SCI), Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9234-756X
Carl H CampbellCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Georgia, United States of America.
Emmanuel RuzindanaMicrobiology Unit, National Reference Laboratory (NRL) Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Warren LancasterThe END Fund, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jean Bosco MbonigabaNeglected Tropical Diseases and Other Parasitic Diseases Unit, Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Aimable MbituyumuremyiMalaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Alan FenwickSchistosomiasis Control Initiative (SCI), Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Ricardo J Soares MagalhaesUQ Spatial Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Innocent TurateInstitute of HIV/AIDS, Disease Prevention and Control (IHDPC), Rwanda Biomedical Center, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rwanda Biomedical Center · RWThe University of Queensland · AUImperial College London · GBUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease caused by Schistosoma parasites. Intervention relies on identifying high-risk regions, yet rapid Schistosoma diagnostics (Kato-Katz stool assays (KK) and circulating cathodic antigen urine assays (CCA)) yield different prevalence estimates. We mapped S. mansoni prevalence and delineated at-risk regions using a survey of schoolchildren in Rwanda, where S. mansoni is an endemic parasite. We asked if different diagnostics resulted in disparities in projected infection risk.

methodsInfection data was obtained from a 2014 Rwandan school-based survey that used KK and CCA diagnostics. Across 386 schools screened by CCA (N = 19,217). To allow for uncertainty when interpreting ambiguous CCA trace readings, which accounted for 28.8% of total test results, we generated two presence-absence datasets: CCA trace as positive and CCA trace as negative. Samples (N = 9,175) from 185 schools were also screened by KK. We included land surface temperature (LST) and the Normalized Difference Vegetation and Normalized Difference Water Indices (NDVI, NDWI) as predictors in geostatistical regressions.

findingsAcross 8,647 children tested by both methods, prevalence was 35.93% for CCA trace as positive, 7.21% for CCA trace as negative and 1.95% for KK. LST was identified as a risk factor using KK, whereas NDVI was a risk factor for CCA models. Models predicted high endemicity in Northern and Western regions of Rwanda, though the CCA trace as positive model identified additional high-risk areas that were overlooked by the other methods. Estimates of current burden for children at highest risk (boys aged 5-9 years) varied by an order of magnitude, with 671,856 boys projected to be infected by CCA trace as positive and only 60,453 projected by CCA trace as negative results.

conclusionsOur findings show that people in Rwanda's Northern, Western and capital regions are at high risk of S. mansoni infection. However, variation in identification of environmental risk factors and delineation of at-risk regions using different diagnostics likely provides confusing messages to disease intervention managers. Further research and statistical analyses, such as latent class analysis, can be used to improve CCA result classification and assess its use in guiding treatment regimes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsAntigens, HelminthChildChild, PreschoolClimateEndemic DiseasesFecesFemaleGeographyHumansMaleNeglected DiseasesPrevalenceRisk FactorsRwandaAntigens, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID31568504
PMCPMC6786642
OpenAlexW2975678755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.