Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31568235›Full record

Trial reportPain2020

The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative allosteric modulator fenobam: pharmacokinetics, side effects, and analgesic effects in healthy human subjects.

Laura F Cavallone, Michael C Montana, Karen Frey, Dorina Kallogjeri, James M Wages, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Tina Doshi, Evan D Kharasch, Robert W Gereau

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry, and Kinetic Modeling of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. In vivo evidence for metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 dysregulation in chronic pain.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Glutamate as a Therapeutic Substrate in Migraine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Partial mGluFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura F CavalloneDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Michael C MontanaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Karen FreyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Dorina KallogjeriDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
James M WagesPain Center, Precision Spine Care, Texarkana, TX, United States.
Thomas L RodebaughDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Tina DoshiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Evan D KharaschDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Robert W GereauDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Washington University in St. Louis · USDuke University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USPrecision Spine (United States) · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
MECHANISMS OF CENTRAL SENSITIZATIONR01NS048602 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEREAU, ROBERT W · 2004 to 2014
$4.2M
Mechanisms of Central SensitizationR01NS106953 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEREAU, ROBERT W · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Mechanisms of Central SensitizationR56NS048602 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEREAU, ROBERT W · 2017 to 2017
$533k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048602NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106953NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS048602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) has been shown to modulate nociception in animals, but no mGlu5 antagonists have been developed commercially as analgesics. The mGlu5 antagonist fenobam [N-(3-chlorophenyl)-N'-(4,5-dihydro-1-methyl-4-oxo-1H-imidazole-2-yl)urea] was originally evaluated for development as a nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic. Fenobam is analgesic in numerous mouse pain models, acting exclusively through mGlu5 blockade. Furthermore, fenobam showed no signs of analgesic tolerance with up to 2 weeks of daily dosing in mice. Analgesic effects of fenobam in humans have not been reported. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate fenobam pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects in humans. We first evaluated single-dose oral fenobam disposition in a parallel-group dose-escalation study in healthy volunteers. A second investigation tested the analgesic effects of fenobam in an established experimental human pain model of cutaneous sensitization using capsaicin cream and heat, in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. The primary outcome measure was the area of hyperalgesia and allodynia around the area applied with heat/capsaicin. Secondary outcome measures included nociception, measured as pain rating on a visual analog scale, heat pain detection threshold, and effects on cognition and mood. Fenobam plasma exposures showed considerable interindividual variability and were not linear with dose. Fenobam reduced sensitization vs placebo at a single timepoint (peak plasma concentration); we found no other difference between fenobam and placebo. Our results suggest highly variable fenobam disposition and minimal analgesic effects at the dose tested. We suggest that future studies testing analgesic effects of mGlu5 blockade are warranted, but such studies should use molecules with improved pharmacokinetic profiles.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesicsDouble-Blind MethodExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansHyperalgesiaImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5Treatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnalgesicsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsfenobamImidazolesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5

Identifiers

PMID31568235
PMCPMC6923598
OpenAlexW2974405043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.