ArticleMedicine2019
Frozen embryo transfer at the cleavage stage can be performed within the first menstrual cycle following the freeze-all strategy without adversely affecting the live birth rate: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The optimal timing of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: delayed or not delayed? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020 · on this mapPooled it
- Impact of interval after fresh cycle cancellation on first frozen embryo transfer outcomes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association Between Diclofenac Sodium Use and Reduced Cycle Cancellation from Premature Ovulation in Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing IVF: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Optimal timing of GnRH antagonist initiation in IVF-ET: a retrospective cohort study on advanced maternal age women.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Follitropin Alpha versus Follitropin Beta in IVF/ICSI Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- The effect of mildly stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle on pregnancy outcomes in overweight/obese women with PCOS prior to frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Short (seven days) versus standard (fourteen days) oestrogen administration in a programmed frozen embryo transfer cycle: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Article
- Effect of interval between oocyte retrieval and resuscitation embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- When Should We Freeze Embryos? Current Data for Fresh and Frozen Embryo Replacement IVF Cycles.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Review
- Meta-analysis of the embryo freezing transfer interval.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Is Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Trigger Beneficial for Natural Cycle Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer?Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Comparison of Stimulated Cycles with Low Dose r-FSH versus Hormone Replacement Cycles for Endometrial Preparation Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Young Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study from China.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Article
- The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thus far, all clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of embryo transfer strategies have selectively delayed the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) by at least 1 menstrual cycle. Nevertheless, this approach, which is based solely on clinical experience, may create unnecessary psychological stress on infertile patients who are anxious to conceive as soon as possible. This study aimed to investigate whether the time interval between oocyte retrieval and subsequent FET affects reproductive outcomes.We implemented a large retrospective cohort study in a single assisted reproductive technology (ART) unit at a university-based hospital, including 1540 autologous FET cycles performed in freeze-all cycles. The beginning of the FET was classified as either 'cycle 1' (performing FET within the first menstrual cycle) or 'cycle ≥2' (performing FET after one or more menstrual cycles). Live birth rate (LBR) was the primary outcome of our study.The mean interval for 'cycle 1' and 'cycle ≥2' FETs was 25.72 ± 5.10 days and 75.33 ± 24.85 days, respectively (P < .001). The type of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and endometrial preparation protocols differed significantly between groups (P = .008 and P = .004, respectively). However, FET groups were similar in many ways. Univariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in LBR between the different cycles (33.1% after 'cycle 1' FET vs 34.2% after 'cycle ≥2' FET, P = .68). To evaluate whether LBR remained unchanged after adjustment for potential confounders, we performed multivariate logistic regression. FET timing had no significant impact on LBR in the first FET (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-1.39).In accordance with the present study, it might not be necessary for clinicians to wait more than 1 menstrual cycle before performing FET. This allows us to reduce otiose deferment in FET, without adversely affecting reproductive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.