SynthesisMedicine2019
Efficacy of blood purification for severe pancreatitis and acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Study Protocol Titles: Erratum.Medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study will assess the efficacy and safety of blood purification (BP) for severe pancreatitis (SP) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
methodsWe will search the following electronic databases of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANGFANG from inception to the present without language restriction. A systematic review and data synthesis will be carried out of randomized controlled trials of BP for the treatment of patients with SP and ARDS. RevMan 5.3 software will be used for statistical analysis.
resultsThis systematic review will evaluate the efficacy and safety of BP for the treatment of patients with SP and ARDS. The primary outcome includes respiratory indexes, blood biochemical and inflammatory factors. The secondary outcomes consist of complications, sepsis, abdominal hemorrhage, renal failure, length of hospital stay, and mortality.
conclusionThis study will provide up-to-date evidence of BP for the treatment of patients with SP and ARDS. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019139467.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.