Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31568006›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Red meat consumption, risk of incidence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular mortality, and the dose-response effect: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.

Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros, Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo, Gabriella Xavier Barbalho Mesquita, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lima, David Franciole de Oliveira Silva, Isac Davidson Santiago Fernandes Pimenta, Ana Katherine da Silveira Gonçalves, Clélia de Oliveira Lyra, Grasiela Piuvezam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. LoweringInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de MedeirosDepartment of Nutrition.
Kesley Pablo Morais de AzevedoPostgraduate Program in Public Health.
Gabriella Xavier Barbalho MesquitaDepartment of Nutrition.
Severina Carla Vieira Cunha LimaDepartment of Nutrition.
David Franciole de Oliveira SilvaPostgraduate Program in Public Health.
Isac Davidson Santiago Fernandes PimentaPostgraduate Program in Public Health.
Ana Katherine da Silveira GonçalvesPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences.
Clélia de Oliveira LyraDepartment of Nutrition.
Grasiela PiuvezamPostgraduate Program in Public Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRed and (particularly) processed meats are high in cholesterol and saturated and solid fatty acids. Their consumption is considered one of the risk factors for metabolic disorders. Numerous studies demonstrated a possible association between red meat consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this protocol, we propose a systematic review of the literature to examine the associations of red meat consumption with CVD incidence and mortality, and explore the potential dose-response relationship.

methodsWe will search MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, LILACS, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cochrane (CENTRAL), WHOLIS, PAHO, and Embase. We will include prospective epidemiological studies (longitudinal cohort). Risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Four independent researchers will conduct all evaluations. Disagreements will be referred to a fifth reviewer. We will summarize our findings using a narrative approach and tables to describe the characteristics of the included studies. The heterogeneity between trial results will be evaluated using a standard chi-squared test with P < .05. We will conduct the study in accordance with the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P).

resultsThis review will evaluate the association between red meat consumption and incidence of CVD and mortality (primary outcome measures). The secondary outcome measure will include the dose-response effect.

conclusionThe findings of this systematic review will summarize the latest evidence of the association between red meat consumption and incidence of CVD and mortality and the dose-response effect through a systematic review and meta-analysis. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019100914.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMeta-Analysis as TopicRed MeatRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID31568006
PMCPMC6756738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.