SynthesisMedicine2019
Efficacy of laser therapy for exercise-induced fatigue: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application research of chronic disease health management in an urban community based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model in the long-term management of diabetes mellitus.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- The Effects of Whole-Body Photobiomodulation Light-Bed Therapy on Creatine Kinase and Salivary Interleukin-6 in a Sample of Trained Males: A Randomized, Crossover Study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaser therapy is widely used for exercise-induced fatigue, while the effect among different studies remains controversial. The present study was to summary available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of laser therapy in subjects with exercise-induced fatigue.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify the potential RCTs from inception to October 2017. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using a random-effects model.
resultsTwenty RCTs involving a total of 394 individuals were included in final analysis. No significant differences were observed between the laser therapy and control for the outcomes of lactate (WMD: -0.19; 95%CI: -0.52 to 0.13; P = .244), repetitions (WMD: 4.44; 95%CI: -1.43 to 10.32; P = .138), work load (WMD: 3.38; 95%CI: -1.15 to 7.91; P = .144), time taken to perform the exercise tests (WMD: 4.42; 95%CI: -2.33 to 11.17; P = .199), creatine kinase (WMD: -41.80; 95%CI: -168.78 to 85.17; P = .519), maximum voluntary contraction (WMD: 23.83; 95%CI: -7.41 to 55.07; P = .135), mean peak forces (WMD: 2.87; 95%CI: -1.01 to 6.76; P = = .147), and visual analog scale (VAS) (WMD: -1.91; 95%CI: -42.89 to 39.08; P = = .927). The results of sensitivity analysis suggested that laser therapy might play an important role on the levels of lactate (WMD: -0.30; 95%CI: -0.59 to -0.01; P = = .040), maximum voluntary contraction (WMD: 33.54; 95%CI: 1.95 to 65.12; P = = .037), and VAS (WMD: -21.00; 95%CI: -40.78 to -1.22; P = = .037). The results of subgroup analyses indicated no significant differences between the laser therapy and placebo for lactate and repetitions when stratified by study design, mean age, gender, and study quality.
conclusionsThe findings of this meta-analysis did not indicate any significant differences between the laser therapy and placebo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.