ArticleMedicine2019
Comparative effectiveness of all levels miniplate fixation versus a modified hybrid fixation in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of alternative-level laminoplasty vs. all-level laminoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Novel Three-Holed Titanium Plate Fixation during Open Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison with Conventional Titanium Plate.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we first reported of a modified hybrid fixation method in expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP) in order to reduce medical costs. The purpose of the present study is to compare the surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the modified fixation with all levels miniplate fixation in EOLP for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Data of 67 patients who underwent EOLP from July 2015 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed, with 33 in the modified group and 34 in the all miniplate group based on their surgical approaches. Laminae were kept open with alternate levels miniplate and anchor fixation in the modified group, while with all levels miniplate fixation in the all miniplate group. Medical costs and clinical results including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and occurrences of complications were investigated and compared between the 2 groups. After evaluation on X-ray, CT, and MRI, radiographic data reflecting cervical alignments, spinal canal enlargement and spinal cord decompression were collected and compared within each group and between the 2 groups.After a follow-up period of about 18 months, no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complication rates, VAS scores, neurological recovery rates and postoperative hospital stays were observed between the 2 groups. However, EOLP with the modified fixation costed less. When comparing the 2 groups, cervical curvature index (CCIs) which reflected cervical alignments and anteroposterior diameters (APDs) reflecting spinal canal enlargement at all the follow-ups had no significant differences. Postoperative open angles which reflected spinal cord decompression of C4 and C6 were significantly smaller in the modified group. However, that difference was no longer detected at the final follow-up. Within each group, APDs increased significantly after surgery. However, no significant differences in CCIs and open angles at different follow-ups were observed in each group.Compared with all miniplate fixation, the modified hybrid fixation in EOLP showed almost the same clinical and radiographic results. However, the modified hybrid fixation method could reduce costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.