Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31567670›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2019

Use of Natural Language Processing Algorithms to Identify Common Data Elements in Operative Notes for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Cody C Wyles, Meagan E Tibbo, Sunyang Fu, Yanshan Wang, Sunghwan Sohn, Walter K Kremers, Daniel J Berry, David G Lewallen, Hilal Maradit-Kremers

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  18. Natural language processing: using artificial intelligence to understand human language in orthopedics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The development and deployment of machine learning models.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cody C WylesDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Meagan E TibboDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sunyang FuDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yanshan WangDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sunghwan SohnDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Walter K KremersDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Daniel J BerryDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
David G LewallenDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hilal Maradit-KremersDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery (C.C.W., M.E.T., D.J.B., D.G.L., and H.M.-K.) and Health Sciences Research (S.F., Y.W., S.S., W.K.K., and H.M.-K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

Precision Orthopedics: Multimodal Data Infrastructure for Personalized Surgical Decisions in Joint ArthroplastyR01AR073147 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Hilal Maradit Kremers · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManual chart review is labor-intensive and requires specialized knowledge possessed by highly trained medical professionals. Natural language processing (NLP) tools are distinctive in their ability to extract critical information from raw text in electronic health records (EHRs). As a proof of concept for the potential application of this technology, we examined the ability of NLP to correctly identify common elements described by surgeons in operative notes for total hip arthroplasty (THA).

methodsWe evaluated primary THAs that had been performed at a single academic institution from 2000 to 2015. A training sample of operative reports was randomly selected to develop prototype NLP algorithms, and additional operative reports were randomly selected as the test sample. Three separate algorithms were created with rules aimed at capturing (1) the operative approach, (2) the fixation method, and (3) the bearing surface category. The algorithms were applied to operative notes to evaluate the language used by 29 different surgeons at our center and were applied to EHR data from outside facilities to determine external validity. Accuracy statistics were calculated with use of manual chart review as the gold standard.

resultsThe operative approach algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.1% to 99.9%). The fixation technique algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 90.7% (95% CI, 86.8% to 93.8%). The bearing surface algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 95.8% (95% CI, 92.7% to 97.8%). Additionally, the NLP algorithms applied to operative reports from other institutions yielded comparable performance, demonstrating external validity.

conclusionsNLP-enabled algorithms are a promising alternative to the current gold standard of manual chart review for identifying common data elements from orthopaedic operative notes. The present study provides a proof of concept for use of NLP techniques in clinical research studies and registry-development endeavors to reliably extract data of interest in an expeditious and cost-effective manner.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCommon Data ElementsNatural Language ProcessingElectronic Health RecordsHumans

Identifiers

PMID31567670
PMCPMC7406139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.