ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2019
Use of Natural Language Processing Algorithms to Identify Common Data Elements in Operative Notes for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does Artificial Intelligence Outperform Natural Intelligence in Interpreting Musculoskeletal Radiological Studies? A Systematic Review.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and validation of natural language processing pipelines to extract injury and surgery-related data elements from ACL reconstruction operative reports.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- A practical guide to the implementation of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic research-Part 3: How orthopaedic research benefits from the implementation of artificial intelligence.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Assessing Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes and Generating an Orthopedic Research Outcome Database via a Natural Language Processing Pipeline: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Automated detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: harnessing the power of natural language processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Deep learning classification of pediatric spinal radiographs for use in large scale imaging registries.Spine deformity · 2024Article
- A taxonomy for advancing systematic error analysis in multi-site electronic health record-based clinical concept extraction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Overview of Artificial Intelligence Research Within Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- FedFSA: Hybrid and federated framework for functional status ascertainment across institutions.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Predictors of Concomitant Meniscal Surgery During Pediatric and Adolescent ACL Reconstruction: Analysis of 4729 Patients Over 20 Years at a Tertiary-Care Regional Children's Hospital.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- External Validation of Natural Language Processing Algorithms to Extract Common Data Elements in THA Operative Notes.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2023Article
- Accelerated evidence synthesis in orthopaedics-the roles of natural language processing, expert annotation and large language models.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in Orthopaedics and sports medicine.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Natural language processing: using artificial intelligence to understand human language in orthopedics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Review
- Recommended practices and ethical considerations for natural language processing-assisted observational research: A scoping review.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- The development and deployment of machine learning models.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManual chart review is labor-intensive and requires specialized knowledge possessed by highly trained medical professionals. Natural language processing (NLP) tools are distinctive in their ability to extract critical information from raw text in electronic health records (EHRs). As a proof of concept for the potential application of this technology, we examined the ability of NLP to correctly identify common elements described by surgeons in operative notes for total hip arthroplasty (THA).
methodsWe evaluated primary THAs that had been performed at a single academic institution from 2000 to 2015. A training sample of operative reports was randomly selected to develop prototype NLP algorithms, and additional operative reports were randomly selected as the test sample. Three separate algorithms were created with rules aimed at capturing (1) the operative approach, (2) the fixation method, and (3) the bearing surface category. The algorithms were applied to operative notes to evaluate the language used by 29 different surgeons at our center and were applied to EHR data from outside facilities to determine external validity. Accuracy statistics were calculated with use of manual chart review as the gold standard.
resultsThe operative approach algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.1% to 99.9%). The fixation technique algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 90.7% (95% CI, 86.8% to 93.8%). The bearing surface algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 95.8% (95% CI, 92.7% to 97.8%). Additionally, the NLP algorithms applied to operative reports from other institutions yielded comparable performance, demonstrating external validity.
conclusionsNLP-enabled algorithms are a promising alternative to the current gold standard of manual chart review for identifying common data elements from orthopaedic operative notes. The present study provides a proof of concept for use of NLP techniques in clinical research studies and registry-development endeavors to reliably extract data of interest in an expeditious and cost-effective manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.