Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31566899›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Chemotherapeutic perfusion of portal vein after tumor thrombectomy and hepatectomy benefits patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched survival analysis.

Yang Gao, Peng-Xiang Wang, Jian-Wen Cheng, Yun-Fan Sun, Bo Hu, Wei Guo, Kai-Qian Zhou, Yue Yin, Yuan-Cheng Li, Jian Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary liver cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yang GaoDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-7830-9727
Peng-Xiang WangDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Jian-Wen ChengDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yun-Fan SunDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Bo HuDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Wei GuoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-9924-638X
Kai-Qian ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yue YinDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Yuan-Cheng LiInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Jun-Feng HuangDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuang-Jian QiuDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-1117
Jia FanDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-5158-629X
Xin-Rong YangDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-7553-2886

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program 2016YFC0902400National Key Research and Development Program 2016YFF0101405National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572823National Natural Science Foundation of China 81602543National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672839National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772551National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772578National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872355State Key Program of National Natural Science of China 81830102The Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Collaborative Innovation Cluster Project 2019CXJQ02The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA12020103The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA12020105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPortal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), signaling dismal outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the survival benefit of postoperative portal vein perfusion chemotherapy (PVC) in patients with HCC and PVTT.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted in 401 consecutive patients with HCC and PVTT who underwent hepatic resection between January 2009 and December 2015 and 67 patients received adjuvant postoperative PVC. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match patients with and without PVC at a ratio of 1:1.

resultsAfter PSM, the median time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in PVC group compared with control group (12.3 vs 5.8 months, P = .001; 19.0 vs 13.4 months, P = .037; respectively). At 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, the cumulative recurrence rates in PVC group were 48.1%, 86.5%, 92.3% ,96.2%, respectively, with OS rates of 63.8%, 37.9%, 24.4%, 18.3%, respectively; whereas cumulative recurrence rates of 76.6%, 91.5%, 94.3%, and 97.2%, respectively and OS rates of 55.4%, 23.0%, 12.4%, and 12.4%, respectively were recorded for the control group. In multivariate analysis, postoperative PVC emerged as a significant predictor for TTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.523; P = .001) and OS (HR, 0.591; P = .010). PVC could reduce early recurrence (≤1 year) rate after surgical resection (40.3% vs 64.2%, P = .006) and clinical outcomes were further enhanced by adding sorafenib to postoperative PVC.

conclusionsCompared with surgical resection alone, postoperative adjuvant PVC treatment boosts survival and reduces early tumor recurrences in patients surgically treated for HCC and PVTT.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHepatectomyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPerfusionPortal VeinPropensity ScoreThrombectomyVenous Thrombosishepatocellular carcinomaportal vein chemotherapyportal vein tumor thrombosisrecurrencesorafenib

Identifiers

PMID31566899
PMCPMC6853833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.