Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31566677›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Perspective: Integration to Implementation (I-to-I) and the Micronutrient Forum-Addressing the Safety and Effectiveness of Vitamin A Supplementation.

Daniel J Raiten, Ian Darnton-Hill, Sherry A Tanumihardjo, Parminder S Suchdev, Emorn Udomkesmalee, Carolina Martinez, Dora Inés Mazariegos, Musonda Mofu, Klaus Kraemer, Homero Martinez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The value of an ecological approach to address micronutrient malnutrition.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Chemical and Bioactive Features ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Daniel J RaitenEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ian Darnton-HillThe Boden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise, and Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sherry A TanumihardjoDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Parminder S SuchdevDepartment of Pediatrics and Emory Global Health Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emorn UdomkesmaleeDepartment of Human Nutrition, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Carolina MartinezInstituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Dora Inés MazariegosInstituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Musonda MofuNational Food and Nutrition Commission, Lusaka, Zambia.
Klaus KraemerSight and Life, Basel, Switzerland.
Homero MartinezNutrition International, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama · GTEmory University · USHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXJohns Hopkins University · USMahidol University · THNational Institutes of Health · USTufts University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ongoing challenge to our ability to address the role of food and nutrition in health promotion and disease prevention is how to design and implement context-specific interventions and guidance that are safe, efficacious, and avoid unintended consequences. The integration to effective implementation (I-to-I) concept is intended to address the complexities of the global health context through engagement of the continuum of stakeholders involved in the generation, translation, and implementation of evidence to public health guidance/programs. The I-to-I approach was developed under the auspices of the Micronutrient Forum and has been previously applied to the question of safety and effectiveness of interventions to prevent and treat nutritional iron deficiency. The present article applies the I-to-I approach to questions regarding the safety and utility of large-dose vitamin A supplementation programs, and presents the authors' perspective on key aspects of the topic, including coverage of the basic and applied biology of vitamin A nutrition and assessment, clinical implications, and an overview of the extant data with regard to both the justification for and utility of available intervention strategies. The article includes some practical considerations based on specific country experiences regarding the challenges of implementing vitamin A-related programs. This is followed by an overview of some challenges associated with engagement of the enabling communities that play a critical role in the implementation of these types of public health interventions. The article concludes with suggestions for potential approaches to move this important agenda forward.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGlobal HealthHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional SciencesNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentPublic HealthVitamin Aeffectivenesshealth promotion and disease preventionintegration to effective implementation (I-to-I)nutrition-sensitivenutrition-specificpolicies and programssafetytransitionvitamin A supplementation

Identifiers

PMID31566677
PMCPMC7442412
OpenAlexW2978812053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.