Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31565730›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2019

Geriatric Research Policy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) policy.

Tomonori Mizutani, Kenichi Nakamura, Haruhiko Fukuda, Asao Ogawa, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Fumio Nagashima, Geriatric Study Committee/Japan Clinical Oncology Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Limited lymphadenectomy for elderly patient with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Association between financial toxicity and frailty among older patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study using COST and G8.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Systemic therapy strategies for elderly patients with gastric cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Challenges in Geriatric Oncology-A Surgeon's Perspective.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomonori MizutaniJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.
Kenichi NakamuraJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.
Haruhiko FukudaJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.
Asao OgawaDepartment of Psycho-Oncology Service, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba.
Tetsuya HamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama.
Fumio NagashimaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo.
Geriatric Study Committee/Japan Clinical Oncology Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the rapid aging of Japan's population, clinical research focusing on older patients with cancer is urgently needed. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted several such clinical trials, but there has been no formal policy for geriatric research. We have therefore established a JCOG policy for geriatric cancer research. We defined the patient selection policy based on treatment tolerance and chronological age. Older patients are categorized into three conceptual groups: 'fit patients' who can undergo the same standard treatment given to younger patients, 'frail patients' for whom best supportive or palliative care is indicated and 'vulnerable patients' who fall between the fit and frail categories. Unmet needs often exist for vulnerable patients. The policy recommends that study endpoints include not only survival but also other endpoints such as physical and cognitive function because the objective of therapy in older patients is not only extended life expectancy but also maintenance of the patient's general condition. In this viewpoint, co-primary or composite endpoints that incorporate geriatric assessment in the study design are often applicable. Study design will differ depending on the study population, clinical question, and treatment. Even for older patients, a randomized clinical trial is still the gold standard when the clinical question asks which treatment is better. An observational study of a broader population is applicable for investigating actual conditions of older patients. This JCOG Geriatric Research Policy includes several practical solutions for various issues in geriatric research. We plan to revise this policy periodically to guide future geriatric research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchGeriatric AssessmentHealth PolicyMedical OncologyAgedEndpoint DeterminationHumansJapanRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicendpointgeriatricgeriatric assessmentJCOGstudy designs

Identifiers

PMID31565730
PMCPMC6886463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.