Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31565424›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Primary health care performance: a scoping review of the current state of measurement in Africa.

Graham Bresick, Felicia Christians, Martha Makwero, Innocent Besigye, Sebaka Malope, Luckson Dullie

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatial accessibility and equity of primary healthcare in Zhejiang, China.International journal for equity in health · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Identifying research gaps and priorities for African family medicine and primary health care.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Graham BresickSchool of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Felicia ChristiansDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
Martha MakweroSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Innocent BesigyeDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sebaka MalopeLesotho Family Medicine Specialty Training Program, Maseru, Lesotho.
Luckson DullieSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCountries with strong primary healthcare (PHC) report better health outcomes, fewer hospital admissions and lower expenditure. People-centred care that delivers essential elements of primary care (PC) leads to improved health outcomes and reduced costs and disparities. Such outcomes underscore the need for validated instruments that measure the extent to which essential, evidence-based features of PC are available and applied to users; and to ensure quality care and provider accountability.

methodsA systematic scoping review method was used to identify peer-reviewed African studies and grey literature on PC performance measurement. The service delivery dimension in the Primary Healthcare Performance Initiative conceptual framework was used to identify key measurable components of PC.

resultsThe review identified 19 African studies and reports that address measuring elements of PC performance. 13 studies included eight nationally validated performance measuring instruments. Of the eight, the South African and Malawian versions of Primary Care Assessment Tool measured service delivery comprehensively and involved PC user, provider and manager stakeholders.

conclusion40 years after Alma Ata and despite strong evidence for people-centred care, significant gaps remain regarding use of validated instruments to measure PC performance in Africa; few validated instruments have been used. Agreement on indicators, fit-for-purpose validated instruments and harmonising existing instruments is needed. Rigorous performance-based research is necessary to inform policy, resource allocation, practice and health worker training; and to ensure access to high quality care in a universal health coverage (UHC) system-research with potential to promote socially responsive, accountable PHC in the true spirit of the Alma Ata and Astana Declarations.

Indexed as

Health policyHealth services researchHealth systems evaluationPublic HealthReview

Identifiers

PMID31565424
PMCPMC6747918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.