Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31565412›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2019

The potential impact of austerity on attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals in Brazil.

Luis Eugenio Portela Fernandes de Souza, Rafael Damasceno de Barros, Maurício Lima Barreto, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Thomas V Hone, Rômulo Paes de Sousa, Alastair Leyland, Davide Rasella, Christopher J Millett, Julia Pescarini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Social environment and services at the Special Immunobiological Reference Centers: epidemiological study, Minas Gerais, 2022-2024.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cohort Profile: The 100 Million Brazilian Cohort.International journal of epidemiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luis Eugenio Portela Fernandes de SouzaInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3273-8873
Rafael Damasceno de BarrosInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Maurício Lima BarretoInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Thomas V HoneSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0703-6973
Rômulo Paes de SousaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alastair LeylandUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Davide RasellaFederal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7260-4386
Christopher J MillettSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Julia PescariniFederal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU13Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/15Wellcome Trust 109949/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the recent decades, Brazil has outperformed comparable countries in its progress toward meeting the Millennium Development Goals. Many of these improvements have been driven by investments in health and social policies. In this article, we aim to identify potential impacts of austerity policies in Brazil on the chances of achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and its consequences for population health. Austerity's anticipated impacts are assessed by analysing the change in federal spending on different budget programmes from 2014 to 2017. We collected budget data made publicly available by the Senate. Among the selected 19 programmes, only 4 had their committed budgets increased, in real terms, between 2014 and 2017. The total amount of extra money committed to these four programmes in 2017, above that committed in 2014, was small (BR$9.7 billion). Of the 15 programmes that had budget cuts in the period from 2014 to 2017, the total decrease amounted to BR$60.2 billion (US$15.3 billion). In addition to the overall large budget reduction, it is noteworthy that the largest proportional reductions were in programmes targeted at more vulnerable populations. In conclusion, it seems clear that the current austerity policies in Brazil will probably damage the population's health and increase inequities, and that the possibility of meeting SDG targets is lower in 2018 than it was in 2015.

Indexed as

Health policies and all other topicsHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID31565412
PMCPMC6747892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.