ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2017
Rapid Liquid Recognition and Quality Inspection with Graphene Test Papers.
Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carbon nanotube-cellulose ink for rapid solvent identification.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2023Article
- Sensitivity Analysis of a Portable Wireless PCB-MEMS Permittivity Sensor Node for Non-Invasive Liquid Recognition.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Structure-Function Relationships of Nanocarbon/Polymer Composites for Chemiresistive Sensing: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Multisensor Systems and Arrays for Medical Applications Employing Naturally-Occurring Compounds and Materials.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Natural-Light-Initiated 3D Macro Zigzag Architecture of Graphene-Reinforced Polystyrene for Gravity-Driven Oil and Water Separation.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2018Article
- Rapid Liquid Recognition and Quality Inspection with Graphene Test Papers.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic tongue is widely applied in liquid sensing for applications in various fields, such as environmental monitoring, healthcare, and food quality test. A rapid and simple liquid-sensing method can greatly facilitate the routine quality tests of liquids. Nanomaterials can help miniaturize sensing devices. In this work, a broad-spectrum liquid-sensing system is developed for rapid liquid recognition based on disposable graphene-polymer nanocomposite test paper prepared through ion-assisted filtration. Using this liquid-sensing system, a number of complex liquids are successfully recognized, including metal salt solutions and polymer solutions. The electronic tongue system is especially suitable for checking the quality of the foodstuff, including soft drinks, alcoholic liquor, and milk. The toxicants in these liquids can be readily detected. Furthermore, the novel material-structure design and liquid-detection method can be expanded to other chemical sensors, which can greatly enrich the chemical information collected from the electrical response of single chemiresistor platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.