Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31565240›Full record

ArticleRMD open2019

Ultrasound is not associated with the presence of systemic autoimmunity or symptoms in individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis.

Laure Brulhart, Deshiré Alpízar-Rodríguez, Michael S Nissen, Pascal Zufferey, Ileana Ciubotariu, Gregory Fleury, Ilias Lazarou, Cem Gabay, Axel Finckh

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pre-RA: Can early diagnosis lead to prevention?Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Laure BrulhartRheumatology, Hopital neuchatelois La Chaux-de-Fonds, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6347-720X
Deshiré Alpízar-RodríguezDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michael S NissenDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pascal ZuffereyRHU DAL, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ileana CiubotariuRheumatology Division, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal (HSCM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gregory FleuryDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ilias LazarouDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cem GabayDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Axel FinckhDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAHôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande · CHInternational Museum of Horology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify whether musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) abnormalities are associated with specific phases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) development in individuals at risk of RA. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of individuals at risk of developing RA, namely first-degree relatives of patients with RA (RA-FDRs) without evidence of established rheumatic disease at inclusion. The inflammatory activity on MSUS was assessed according to a validated score (SONAR). Active MSUS was defined as a total B-mode score greater than 8, including at least one joint with significant synovitis (grade 2 or 3) or significant synovial hyperaemia (Doppler score greater than 1). We used logistic regression to analyse associations between MSUS findings and recognised preclinical phases of RA development, adjusting for other demographic and biological characteristics. Results: A total of 273 RA-FDRs were analysed, of whom 23 (8%) were anticitrullinated protein autoantibodies-positive, 58 (21%) had unclassified arthritis and 96 (35%) had an active MSUS, which was only associated with unclassified arthritis (OR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.3). Conclusion: In individuals at risk of RA, active MSUS was associated with the presence of unclassified arthritis, but not with any of the earlier described phases of RA development. These findings do not support an indiscriminate use of ultrasound in a screening strategy for preclinical RA.

Indexed as

AdultArthritisArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHyperemiaMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal SystemProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentSynovitisAutoantibodiesearly rheumatoid arthritisrheumatoid arthritisultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31565240
PMCPMC6744083
OpenAlexW2969644314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.