Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31565086›Full record

ArticleArchaeological and anthropological sciences2019

Diet, cuisine and consumption practices of the first farmers in the southeastern Baltic.

Harry K Robson, Raminta Skipitytė, Giedrė Piličiauskienė, Alexandre Lucquin, Carl Heron, Oliver E Craig, Gytis Piličiauskas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The impact of farming on prehistoric culinary practices throughout Northern Europe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Harry K Robson1BioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4850-692X
Raminta Skipitytė2Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Saulėtekio Ave. 3, Vilnius 10257, Lithuania.
Giedrė Piličiauskienė4Faculty of History, Vilnius University, Universiteto st. 7, Vilnius 01513, Lithuania.
Alexandre Lucquin1BioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Carl Heron5Department of Scientific Research, The British Museum, Great Russell Street, London, WC1B 3DG, UK.
Oliver E Craig1BioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Gytis Piličiauskas3Lithuanian Institute of History, Kražių st. 5, Vilnius 01108, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the arrival of the Early Neolithic Globular Amphora and Corded Ware cultures into the southeastern Baltic, ca. 2900/2800-2400 cal BC, a new type of economy was introduced, animal husbandry. However, the degree to which this transformed the subsistence economy is unknown. Here, we conducted organic residue analyses of 64 ceramic vessels to identify their contents. The vessels were sampled from 10 Lithuanian archaeological sites dating across the Subneolithic-Neolithic transition to the Early Bronze Age (ca. 2900/2800-1300 cal BC). Our results demonstrate that regardless of location or vessel type, many ceramics were used to process aquatic resources. Against our expectations, this association continued even after marked economic change concurrent with the migration of pastoralists from central and southeastern Europe, as evidenced by recent ancient DNA analysis of human remains. Moreover, we observed dairy fats in pottery from all cultures of the Early Neolithic (i.e. Rzucewo, Globular Amphora and Corded Ware) but unlike other regions of Europe, it seems that these were incorporated into indigenous culinary practices. Furthermore, some vessels were used to process plant foods, and others may have been used for the production and/or storage of birch bark tar. However, evidence for domesticated plant processing, for example millet, was absent. We show that organic residue analysis of pottery provides a different picture of past consumption patterns compared to the stable isotope analysis of human remains from isolated burials where a clear dietary shift is evident.

Indexed as

Aquatic biomarkersBronze AgeCeramic vesselsNeolithicOrganic residue analysisSoutheastern Baltic

Identifiers

PMID31565086
PMCPMC6743674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.