Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31565072›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

Different models for prediction of radical cystectomy postoperative complications and care pathways.

Jacob Taylor, Xiaosong Meng, Audrey Renson, Angela B Smith, James S Wysock, Samir S Taneja, William C Huang, Marc A Bjurlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Bladder Cancer and Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Applications.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob TaylorDivison of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Xiaosong MengDivison of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Audrey RensonDepartment of Clinical Research, NYU Langone Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Angela B SmithDepartment of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
James S WysockDivison of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Samir S TanejaDivison of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
William C HuangDivison of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Marc A BjurlinDepartment of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 2nd floor, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3500-8849
NYU Langone Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBrooklyn Hospital Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical cystectomy for bladder cancer has one of the highest rates of morbidity among urologic surgery, but the ability to predict postoperative complications remains poor. Our study objective was to create machine learning models to predict complications and factors leading to extended length of hospital stay and discharge to a higher level of care after radical cystectomy.

methodsUsing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, peri-operative adverse outcome variables for patients undergoing elective radical cystectomy for bladder cancer from 2005 to 2016 were extracted. Variables assessed include occurrence of minor, infectious, serious, or any adverse events, extended length of hospital stay, and discharge to higher-level care. To develop predictive models of radical cystectomy complications, we fit generalized additive model (GAM), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic, neural network, and random forest models to training data using various candidate predictor variables. Each model was evaluated on the test data using receiver operating characteristic curves.

resultsA total of 7557 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria, and 2221 complications occurred. LASSO logistic models demonstrated the highest area under curve for predicting any complications (0.63), discharge to a higher level of care (0.75), extended length of stay (0.68), and infectious (0.62) adverse events. This was comparable with random forest in predicting minor (0.60) and serious (0.63) adverse events.

conclusionsOur models perform modestly in predicting radical cystectomy complications, highlighting both the complex cystectomy process and the limitations of large healthcare datasets. Identifying the most important variable leading to each type of adverse event may allow for further strategies to model cystectomy complications and target optimization of modifiable variables pre-operative to reduce postoperative adverse events.

Indexed as

bladder cancercomplicationscystectomymachine learningmodeling

Identifiers

PMID31565072
PMCPMC6755632
OpenAlexW2973553930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.