ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2019
Renal pathology and clinical associations in systemic sclerosis: a historical cohort study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary Membranous Nephropathy. A Narrative Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Biomarkers in Systemic Sclerosis: An Overview.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Biomarkers in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Review
- Kidney Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Systemic Scleroderma-Definition, Clinical Picture and Laboratory Diagnostics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Overlap Syndrome of Diffuse Systemic Sclerosis, Sjögren Syndrome, and ANCA-Associated Renal-Limited Vasculitis: Three Entities in One Patient - Case Report.Case reports in nephrology and dialysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe information guiding the treatment decision(s) for renal diseases in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the renal pathological finding. This study aimed to evaluate the renal pathological diagnosis and its clinical feature among SSc.
methodA historical cohort study was performed on adult Thai SSc patients who underwent renal biopsy during January 2005-December 2016. The renal pathologic findings and patient clinical characteristics were reviewed. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was applied to analyze the association between clinical manifestation and renal pathology.
resultsOf the 26 SSc patients identified (77% female), 46% had the diffuse cutaneous SSc subtype. The mean age at the time of biopsy was 53.2±14.4 years and median duration of disease was 2.4 years (IQR 0.5-7.0). Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) was the most common renal manifestation (53.9%) followed by nephrotic syndrome (19.2%) and nephritis (11.5%). The pathological diagnosis included lupus nephritis (LN) class IV (26.9%), LN class V (19.2%), scleroderma renal crisis (SRC; 19.3%), progressive renal disease in scleroderma (7.7%), and IgA nephropathy (7.7%). The nephrotic syndrome was the most common renal feature among LN class V patients, whereas RPGN was the commonest renal presentation among LN class IV and SRC patients (
conclusionThis is the first report of renal pathologic findings in Thai SSc patients. RPGN is the commonest renal manifestation among SSc who underwent kidney biopsy; for whom LN was the most common pathological finding. Nephrotic syndrome is a clinical feature of glomerular diseases other than renal involvement in SSc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.