ArticleIEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering2018
Differentially Private Distributed Online Learning.
Article in IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effective Model Update for Adaptive Classification of Text Streams in a Distributed Learning Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Correlated Noise-assisted Decentralized Differentially Private Estimation Protocol, and its application to fMRI Source Separation.IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the big data era, the generation of data presents some new characteristics, including wide distribution, high velocity, high dimensionality, and privacy concern. To address these challenges for big data analytics, we develop a privacy-preserving distributed online learning framework on the data collected from distributed data sources. Specifically, each node (i.e., data source) has the capacity of learning a model from its local dataset, and exchanges intermediate parameters with a random part of their own neighboring (logically connected) nodes. Hence, the topology of the communications in our distributed computing framework is unfixed in practice. As online learning always performs on the sensitive data, we introduce the notion of differential privacy (DP) into our distributed online learning algorithm (DOLA) to protect the data privacy during the learning, which prevents an adversary from inferring any significant sensitive information. Our model is of general value for big data analytics in the distributed setting, because it can provide rigorous and scalable privacy proof and have much less computational complexity when compared to classic schemes, e.g., secure multiparty computation (SMC). To tackle high-dimensional incoming data entries, we study a sparse version of the DOLA with novel DP techniques to save the computing resources and improve the utility. Furthermore, we present two modified private DOLAs to meet the need of practical applications. One is to convert the DOLA to distributed stochastic optimization in an offline setting, the other is to use the mini-batches approach to reduce the amount of the perturbation noise and improve the utility. We conduct experiments on real datasets in a configured distributed platform. Numerical experiment results validate the feasibility of our private DOLAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.