Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31564223›Full record

ReviewWomen's health (London, England)

Women's sexual health in later life: Gaps and opportunities in research and practice.

Alexandra Ch Nowakowski, J E Sumerau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra Ch NowakowskiDepartment of Geriatrics/Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-2482
J E SumerauDepartment of Sociology, College of Social Sciences and Public Health, The University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article complements emerging reviews and summaries of the recent expansion of sexuality studies within and beyond geriatrics and associated fields. To this end, we synthesize important insights and discussions taking place throughout geriatrics and other fields at present, and situate these conversations in broader discussions concerning sexualities, health, and aging. In so doing, we outline some gaps in existing work as well as opportunities for not only filling these gaps in our understandings of women's sexual health in later life but also in order to demonstrate the usefulness of expanding prior approaches to analyses concerning womanhood, aging, sexualities, and health over the life course. In conclusion, we outline some specific pathways for future research concerning women's sexual health in later life.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorSexual HealthSexualityAgingFemaleHumansaginggenderreviewsexual healthsexualities

Identifiers

PMID31564223
PMCPMC6769205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.