ArticleMolecular biology reports2019
Diagnostic accuracy of interferon (IFN)-γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10) as a biomarker for the discrimination of active and latent tuberculosis.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of biomarkers for differentiating active tuberculosis from latent tuberculosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Host-protein biomarkers distinguish asymptomatic TB in an active case finding study.IJTLD open · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care triage tests for pulmonary tuberculosis using host blood protein biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Recent progress in tuberculosis diagnosis: insights into blood-based biomarkers and emerging technologies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Interferon-Inducible Protein-10 as a Marker to Detect Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Combined analysis of whole blood interferon gamma release assay and complete blood count analysis for rapid discrimination of active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021Article
- High sensitivity and specificity of a 5-analyte protein and microRNA biosignature for identification of active tuberculosis.Clinical & translational immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess the potency of Interferon (IFN)-γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10) stimulated by recombinant PE35 and PPE68 as a biomarker in differentiating between active and latent tuberculosis. Patients with active pulmonary TB (PTB) (n = 30), latent TB infection (LTBI) (n = 29), and BCG-vaccinated healthy controls (HCs) (n = 30) were enrolled and blood samples were taken from them. The diagnostic performance of IP-10 was evaluated by the Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The median IP-10 concentrations following stimulation with recombinant PE35 and PPE68 were significantly higher in TB-infected group (both PTB and LTBI) compared with HCs (P < 0.05). It was also significantly higher in PTB patients compared with individuals with LTBI (P < 0.05). The discriminatory performance of IP-10 following stimulation with recombinant PE35 and PPE68 (assessed by AUC) between TB patients and HCs were similar (AUC: 0.79 [95% CI 0.68-0.89] and 0.79 [95% CI 0.69-0.89], respectively). AUCs of IP-10 following stimulation with recombinant PE35 and PPE68 for distinguishing between PTB and LTBI groups were 0.63 (95% CI 0.47-0.79) and 0.61 (0.45-0.77), respectively. Under the selected cut-off values, the sensitivity and specificity of IP-10 for distinguishing of TB-infected and HCs after stimulation with recombinant PE35 was 74.5% and 73%, respectively and after stimulation with recombinant PPE68 were 76.5% and 63%, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of IP-10 for differentiating of PTB and LTBI following stimulation with recombinant PE35 and PPE68 were 770 pg/ml (sensitivity: 63%; specificity: 62%) and 502 pg/ml (sensitivity: 80%; specificity: 52%), respectively. IP-10 stimulated by recombinant PE35 and PPE68 is a promising biomarker for TB diagnosis. However, it doesn't have desirable sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between PTB and LTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31564016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.