Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31563990›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

MR variability of collagen meniscal implant remodelling in patients with good clinical outcome.

Balazs K Kovacs, Rolf Huegli, Dorothee Harder, Luca Cedro, Roger Berbig, Felix Amsler, Susanne Bensler, Michael T Hirschmann, Anna Hirschmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Current State of Meniscus Replacements.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Biologic Augmentation of Isolated Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Balazs K Kovacs *Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Rolf Huegli *Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz, 4104, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
Dorothee HarderClinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Luca CedroClinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Roger BerbigSportClinic Zurich Hirslanden, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Felix AmslerAmsler Consulting, Gundeldingerrain 111, 4059, Basel, Switzerland.
Susanne BenslerDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden AG, Im Ergel 1, 5404, Baden, Switzerland.
Michael T HirschmannDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
Anna HirschmannClinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. anna.hirschmann@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1560-0247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCollagen meniscal implants (CMI) have variable imaging findings on MRI and it remains ambiguous, if alterations may be present in asymptomatic patients. The aim was, to evaluate MR morphological characteristics and volume of CMI in the early, mid- and long-term follow-up.

methodsFifty-seven patients (mean age, 43.6±11 years; 41 male/16 female) with good clinical outcome (subjective visual analogue scale for satisfaction < 2 and a Lysholm-score ≥ 84) after CMI were assessed retrospectively using MRI 1, 2 and 3-8 years postoperatively. CMI morphology, signal intensity (SI), homogeneity and size were assessed and a meniscal score was calculated. Chondral defects and bone marrow edema pattern were reported and summarized in a chondral score. Meniscal extrusion and volume were evaluated. Intra- and inter-reader reliabilities were calculated. Spearman and partial correlations were used (p < 0.05).

resultsOne year postoperatively, the CMI varied in size [10% (4/40) normal, 30% (12/40) small, 60% (24/40) hypertrophic] and was hyperintense and inhomogeneous in all patients. At long-term follow-up, the size of CMI decreased [6% (1/17) resorbed, 18% (3/17) normal, 41% (7/17) small, 35% (6/17) hypertrophic]. The SI of the CMI changed to normal in only 13% (2/16). The majority was still hyperintense [87% (14/16)]. Less meniscal extrusion was present in the follow-up [71% (11/16) versus initially 93% (37/40)]. The meniscal score improved significantly (ρ = 0.28). Over time, full-thickness femoral chondral defects were increasingly present [65% (10/17) versus initially 33% (13/40)] and the chondral score worsened significantly (p = 0.017).

conclusionAbnormal and inhomogeneous SI and irregular margins of the early postoperative CMI on MRI are findings seen in patients with good clinical results and should not necessarily be overcalled when reporting MRI. These features tend to decrease over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

AdultBone Marrow DiseasesCartilage, ArticularCollagenEdemaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMenisci, TibialMeniscusMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodProsthesis ImplantationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCollagenCollagenKneeMagnetic resonance imagingMeniscusOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.