Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31563960›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2020

Exploring evolutionary theories of plant defence investment using field populations of the deadly carrot.

Karen Martinez-Swatson, Rasmus Kjøller, Federico Cozzi, Henrik Toft Simonsen, Nina Rønsted, Christopher Barnes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen Martinez-SwatsonNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rasmus KjøllerDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Federico CozziBiomin Research Center, Technopark, Tulln, Austria.
Henrik Toft SimonsenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Nina RønstedNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher BarnesNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Natural History Museum Aarhus · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThere are a number of disparate models predicting variation in plant chemical defences between species, and within a single species over space and time. These can give conflicting predictions. Here we review a number of these theories, before assessing their power to predict the spatial-temporal variation of thapsigargins between and within populations of the deadly carrot (Thapsia garganica). By utilizing multiple models simultaneously (optimum defence theory, growth rate hypothesis, growth-differentiation balance hypothesis, intra-specific framework and resource exchange model of plant defence), we will highlight gaps in their predictions and evaluate the performance of each.

methodsThapsigargins are potent anti-herbivore compounds that occur in limited richness across the different plant tissues of T. garganica, and therefore represent an ideal system for exploring these models. Thapsia garganica plants were collected from six locations on the island of Ibiza, Spain, and the thapsigargins quantified within reproductive, vegetative and below-ground tissues. The effects of sampling time, location, mammalian herbivory, soil nutrition and changing root-associated fungal communities on the concentrations of thapsigargins within these in situ observations were analysed, and the results were compared with our model predictions. KEY

resultsThe models performed well in predicting the general defence strategy of T. garganica and the above-ground distribution of thapsigargins, but failed to predict the considerable proportion of defences found below ground. Models predicting variation over environmental gradients gave conflicting and less specific predictions, with intraspecific variation remaining less understood.

conclusionHere we found that multiple models predicting the general defence strategy of plant species could likely be integrated into a single model, while also finding a clear need to better incorporate below-ground defences into models of plant chemical defences. We found that constitutive and induced thapsigargins differed in their regulation, and suggest that models predicting intraspecific defences should consider them separately. Finally, we suggest that in situ studies be supplemented with experiments in controlled environments to identify specific environmental parameters that regulate variation in defences within species.

Indexed as

Daucus carotaAnimalsHerbivorySpainApiaceaechemical defencefungal inhibitiongrowth–differentiation balance hypothesisgrowth rate hypothesisherbivoryoptimal defence theoryplant defence modelresource exchange model of plant defenceroot-associated fungisoilThapsia garganica

Identifiers

PMID31563960
PMCPMC7182587
OpenAlexW2977011009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.