Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31563955›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

Investigation of tylosin in feed of feedlot cattle and effects on liver abscess prevalence, and fecal and soil microbiomes and resistomes1.

Margaret D Weinroth, Jennifer N Martin, Enrique Doster, Ifigenia Geornaras, Jennifer K Parker, Clay R Carlson, Jessica L Metcalf, Paul S Morley, Keith E Belk

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal assessment of the prevalence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. FI: The Fecobiome Initiative.Foodborne pathogens and disease · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A review of the resistome within the digestive tract of livestock.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret D WeinrothDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Jennifer N MartinDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Enrique DosterDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Ifigenia GeornarasDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Jennifer K ParkerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Clay R CarlsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Jessica L MetcalfDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Paul S MorleyVeterinary Education, Research and Outreach Center, Texas A&M University and West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX.
Keith E BelkDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Colorado State University · USWest Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Veterinary Pre-Doctoral Research Scholars ProgramT32OD012201 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VANDEWOUDE, SUE · 2013 to 2019
$795k
NIH HHS T32 OD012201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle are detrimental to animal performance and economic return. Tylosin, a macrolide antibiotic, is used to reduce prevalence of liver abscesses, though there is variable efficacy among different groups of cattle. There is an increased importance in better understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of this condition because of growing concern over antibiotic resistance and increased scrutiny regarding use of antibiotics in food animal production. The objective of this study was to compare the microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance genes (resistomes) of feces of feedlot cattle administered or not administered tylosin and in their pen soil in 3 geographical regions with differing liver abscess prevalences. Cattle (total of 2,256) from 3 geographical regions were selected for inclusion based on dietary supplementation with tylosin (yes/no). Feces and pen soil samples were collected before harvest, and liver abscesses were identified at harvest. Shotgun and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing were used to evaluate the soil and feces. Microbiome and resistome composition of feces (as compared by UniFrac distances and Euclidian distances, respectively) did not differ (P > 0.05) among tylosin or no tylosin-administered cattle. However, feedlot location was associated with differences (P ≤ 0.05) of resistomes and microbiomes. Using LASSO, a statistical model identified both fecal and soil microbial communities as predictive of liver abscess prevalence in pens. This model explained 75% of the variation in liver abscess prevalence, though a larger sample size would be needed to increase robustness of the model. These data suggest that tylosin exposure does not have a large impact on cattle resistomes or microbiomes, but instead, location of cattle production may be a stronger driver of both the resistome and microbiome composition of feces.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleCattle DiseasesDietary SupplementsDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesFemaleGeographyLiver AbscessMaleMetagenomicsMicrobiotaModels, StatisticalPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsTylosin16S rRNAantibiotic resistanceresistomeshotgun metagenomics

Identifiers

PMID31563955
PMCPMC6827412
OpenAlexW2975419944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.