Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2020
A head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biological-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a randomised, open-label, blinded-assessor trial.
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 27 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
152 citing papers in PubMed, 27 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 284 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood-test monitoring strategies for patients established on immune-suppressing drugs: a mixed-methods study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- The Relative Effects of Monotherapies for Psoriatic Nails: A Network Meta-Analysis Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Evidence for Ixekizumab in the Treatment of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Systematic Literature Review 2022-2023.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature research informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2023 update.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Guideline
- Different biologics for biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of therapies for psoriatic arthritis on patient-reported outcomes.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Nail Psoriasis Targeted Therapies: A Systematic Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of IL-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Immunologic research · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: updates to a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Adverse events associated with anti-IL-17 agents for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Management of particular clinical situations in psoriatic arthritis: an expert's recommendation document based on systematic literature review and extended Delphi process.Rheumatology international · 2021Pooled it
- Does current evidence on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis reinforce an effect on radiographic progression? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare efficacy and safety of ixekizumab (IXE) to adalimumab (ADA) in biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve patients with both active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and skin disease and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARDs).
methodsPatients with active PsA were randomised (1:1) to approved dosing of IXE or ADA in an open-label, head-to-head, blinded assessor clinical trial. The primary objective was to evaluate whether IXE was superior to ADA at week 24 for simultaneous achievement of a ≥50% improvement from baseline in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) and a 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI100). Major secondary objectives, also at week 24, were to evaluate whether IXE was: (1) non-inferior to ADA for achievement of ACR50 and (2) superior to ADA for PASI100 response. Additional PsA, skin, treat-to-target and quality-of-life outcome measures were assessed at week 24.
resultsThe primary efficacy endpoint was met (IXE: 36%, ADA: 28%; p=0.036). IXE was non-inferior for ACR50 response (IXE: 51%, ADA: 47%; treatment difference: 3.9%) and superior for PASI100 response (IXE: 60%, ADA: 47%; p=0.001). IXE had greater response versus ADA in additional PsA, skin, nail, treat-to-target and quality-of-life outcomes. Serious adverse events were reported in 8.5% (ADA) and 3.5% (IXE) of patients.
conclusionsIXE was superior to ADA in achievement of simultaneous improvement of joint and skin disease (ACR50 and PASI100) in patients with PsA and inadequate response to csDMARDs. Safety and tolerability for both biologicals were aligned with established safety profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.