Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31563628›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology2020

Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Tegan A Hunter, Sarita Sonalkar, Courtney A Schreiber, Lisa K Perriera, Mary D Sammel, Aletha Y Akers

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04963582 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Does LI4 Acupuncture Provide an Effective Analgesia During Intrauterine Device

TypeinterventionalSponsorNigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled72ConditionsIUD Insertion Complication, Acute PainArmsAcupuncture
NCT06110871 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

"The Effect of Inhaler Lavender, Focus and Music on Women's Pain, Anxiety, in Intrauterine Device Application"

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurkish Ministry of Health, Kahramanmaras Provincial Health DirectorateRan2023 to 2023Enrolled240ConditionsVisual Analog Pain ScaleArmsinhaled lavender, Working Group 2: Focusing, Working Group 3 music
NCT07044622 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Intrauterine Device (IUD) Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsPainArmsTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
NCT07546370 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The PLAN IUD Trial: The Effectiveness of Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen Compared to Lidocaine Injection Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen to Manage Pain During IntraUterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonakshi SawhneyRan2026 to 2027Enrolled66ConditionsPain During Intrauterine Device InsertionArmsPrilocaine, Lidocaine, Lidocaine HCl 1%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Misoprostol for intrauterine device placement.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Safety and efficacy of a suction cervical stabilizer for IUD insertion: Results from a multicenter post-marketing study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tegan A HunterUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Electronic address: thunter@med.miami.edu.
Sarita SonalkarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Courtney A SchreiberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lisa K PerrieraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mary D SammelDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Aletha Y AkersDivision of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

WOMENS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENTK12HD001265 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth A Howell · 1998 to 2026
$7.5M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo identify predictors of anticipated pain with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion in adolescents and young women.

designWe performed linear regression to identify demographic, sexual/gynecologic history, and mood covariates associated with anticipated pain using a visual analogue scale pain score collected as part of a single-blind randomized trial of women who received a 13.5-mg levonorgestrel IUD.

settingThree academic family planning clinics in Philadelphia Pennsylvania.

participantsNinety-three adolescents and young adult women aged 14-22 years.

interventionParticipants received either a 1% lidocaine or sham paracervical block.

main outcome measuresAnticipated pain measured using a visual analogue scale before and perceived pain at 6 time points during the IUD insertion procedure.

resultsBlack or African American participants had a median anticipated pain score of 68 (interquartile range [IQR], 52-83), White participants had a median anticipated pain of 51 (IQR, 35-68), whereas participants of other races had a median anticipated pain score of 64 (IQR, 36-73); P = .012. In multivariate analysis, race was the only covariate that significantly predicted anticipated pain at IUD insertion. Women with anticipated pain scores above the median had significantly higher perceived pain during all timepoints of the IUD insertion procedure.

conclusionIncreased anticipated pain is associated with increased perceived pain with IUD insertion. Black adolescent women experience greater anticipated pain with IUD insertion. This population might benefit from counseling and clinical measures to reduce this barrier to IUD use.

Indexed as

Pain PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesLevonorgestrelProcedural PainSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultLevonorgestrelAdolescentContraceptive devicesIntrauterine devicesPain

Identifiers

PMID31563628
PMCPMC6980875
OpenAlexW2974937274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.