Observational studyGastroenterology2020
Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies.
Observational study in Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review: risk prediction models for metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Pooled it
- AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review.Gastroenterology · 2023Guideline
- Self-Directed Mikoto Simulator Training for Colonoscopy in Gastroenterology Trainees: An International Multicenter Randomized Trial.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Trial
- Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence After Adenoma and Serrated Polyp Removal: Results From the Colonprev Trial.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Trial
- Study on the mechanism of Fuzi Lizhong decoction in the treatment of colorectal cancer of spleen kidney deficiency from the perspective of intestinal flora and hypoxia inducible factor-1α signalling pathway.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2025Trial
- Impact of an artificial intelligence-aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2024Trial
- Gastrointestinal Tract Polyp Detection, Tracking, and Surveillance and the Role of Artificial Intelligence.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Time trends in post-polypectomy surveillance guideline adherence: analysis of over 90 000 colonoscopies with polypectomy.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- ColoLDB: a machine learning-based predictive model for colorectal cancer using routine laboratory parameters.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Navigating the Terrain of Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Charting the Complex Landscape of Guidelines and Recurrence Risks.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- A prediction model for metachronous colorectal cancer: development and validation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Balancing safety and effectiveness in colonoscopy for older adults: a narrative review.Intestinal research · 2025Review
- Long-term colorectal cancer incidence in a post-endoscopic screening cohort, accounting for surveillance, by baseline polyp group, anatomic subsite, and sex.Journal of medical screening · 2025Article
- Screening outcomes at second FIT screening in individuals with a first time negative FIT-result or low-risk adenomas: Results from a nationwide FIT screening program.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: a review of guidelines, current evidence, and future directions.Colorectal cancer · 2025Article
- Validation of multiple deep learning models for colorectal tumor differentiation with endoscopic ultrasound images: a dual-center study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- A Blood-Based Assay for Detection of Patients with Advanced Adenomas.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Efficiency of Real-time Computer-aided Polyp Detection during Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Pilot Study.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025Article
- Surveillance after Endoscopic Resection for Colorectal Tumors: A Comprehensive Review.Digestion · 2025Review
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2020
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsRecommendation of surveillance colonoscopy should be based on risk of colorectal cancer and death after adenoma removal. We aimed to develop a risk classification system based on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality following adenoma removal.
methodsWe performed a multicenter population-based cohort study of 236,089 individuals (median patient age, 56 years; 37.8% male) undergoing screening colonoscopies with adequate bowel cleansing and cecum intubation at 132 centers in the Polish National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, from 2000 through 2011. Subjects were followed for a median 7.1 years and information was collected on colorectal cancer development and death. We used recursive partitioning and multivariable Cox models to identify associations between colorectal cancer risk and patient and adenoma characteristics (diameter, growth pattern, grade of dysplasia, and number of adenomas). We developed a risk classification system based on standardized incidence ratios, using data from the Polish population for comparison. The primary endpoints were colorectal cancer incidence and colorectal cancer death.
resultsWe identified 130 colorectal cancers in individuals who had adenomas removed at screening (46.5 per 100,000 person-years) vs 309 in individuals without adenomas (22.2 per 100,000 person-years). Compared with individuals without adenomas, adenomas ≥20 mm in diameter and high-grade dysplasia were associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer (adjusted hazard ratios 9.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.39-13.39, and 3.58; 95% CI 1.96-6.54, respectively). Compared with the general population, colorectal cancer risk was higher or comparable only for individuals with adenomas ≥20 mm in diameter (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 2.07; 95% CI 1.40-2.93) or with high-grade dysplasia (SIR 0.79; 95% CI 0.39-1.41), whereas for individuals with other adenoma characteristics the risk was lower (SIR 0.35; 95% CI 0.28-0.44). We developed a high-risk classification based on adenoma size ≥20 mm or high-grade dysplasia (instead of the current high-risk classification cutoff of ≥3 adenomas or any adenoma with villous growth pattern, high-grade dysplasia, or ≥10 mm in diameter). Our classification system would reduce the number of individuals classified as high-risk and requiring intensive surveillance from 15,242 (36.5%) to 3980 (9.5%), without increasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomas (risk difference per 100,000 person-years, 5.6; 95% CI -10.7 to 22.0).
conclusionsUsing data from the Polish National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, we developed a risk classification system that would reduce the number of individuals classified as high risk and require intensive surveillance more than 3-fold, without increasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomas. This system could optimize the use of surveillance colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.