Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31563610›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2019

The dorsal hippocampus mediates synaptic destabilization and memory lability in the amygdala in the absence of contextual novelty.

Nicole C Ferrara, Sydney Trask, Shane E Pullins, Fred J Helmstetter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Context and Time Regulate Fear Memory Consolidation and Reconsolidation in the Basolateral Amygdala Complex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Developmental Shifts in Amygdala Activity during a High Social Drive State.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole C FerraraDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Sydney TraskDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Shane E PullinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Fred J HelmstetterDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: fjh@uwm.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Systems and molecular mechanisms of retrieval-dependent memory destabilizationR01MH112141 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI HELMSTETTER, FRED J · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Protein degradation and age-related cognitive impairmentR21AG053854 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI HELMSTETTER, FRED J · 2016 to 2017
$411k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG053854NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recall of a previously formed fear memory triggers a process through which synapses in the amygdala become "destabilized". This labile state at retrieval may be critical for the plasticity required to modify, update, or disrupt long-term memories. One component of this process involves the rapid internalization of calcium impermeable AMPA receptors (CI-AMPAR). While some recent work has focused on the details of modifying amygdala synapses, much less is known about the environmental factors that control memory updating and the important circuit level processes. Synchrony between the hippocampus and amygdala increases during memory retrieval and stable memories can sometimes be made labile with hippocampal manipulations. Recent work shows that memory lability at retrieval is influenced by the novelty of the retrieval environment, and detection of this novelty likely relies on the dorsal hippocampus (DH). Our goal was to determine how local activity in the DH contributes to memory lability and synaptic destabilization in the amygdala during retrieval when contextual novelty is introduced. We found that contextual novelty during retrieval is necessary for alterations in amygdala activity and CI-AMPAR internalization. In the absence of novelty, suppression of local activity in the DH prior to learning allowed for retrieval-dependent CI-AMPAR internalization in the amygdala. We next tested whether the changes in AMPAR internalization were accompanied by differences in memory lability. We found that a memory was made labile when activity within the DH was disrupted in the absence of contextual novelty. These results suggest that the DH is important for encoding contextual information during learning that regulates retrieval-dependent memory modification in the amygdala.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAmygdalaAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalFearHippocampusMaleMemoryNeural PathwaysRatsRats, Long-EvansSynapsesAMPAAmygdalaContextDestabilizationFear conditioningHippocampusMemoryReconsolidationRetrieval

Identifiers

PMID31563610
PMCPMC6890228
OpenAlexW2976264329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.