ArticleMorphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes2019
Simulation of integrative physiology for medical education.
Article in Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical-medical convergence in heart failure: Artificial intelligence, finite-element modeling, and 3D printing for diagnosis and prognosis.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of flipped classroom on learning and satisfaction of nursing students in physiology laboratory education: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing medical physiology education: a narrative review of the transition from traditional classrooms to artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Use of simulation for teaching biomedical sciences to undergraduate medical students- a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Gaining consensus on expert rule statements for acute respiratory failure digital twin patient model in intensive care unit using a Delphi method.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Article
- Developing DELPHI expert consensus rules for a digital twin model of acute stroke care in the neuro critical care unit.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Development and usability testing of a patient digital twin for critical care education: a mixed methods study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Predictive modeling in neurocritical care using causal artificial intelligence.World journal of critical care medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical education is founded on the understanding of physiology. While lecture materials and reading contribute to the learning of physiology, the richness and complexity of the subject suggest that more active learning methods may provide a richer introduction to the science as it applies to the practice of medicine. Simulation has been previously used in basic science to better understand the interaction of physiological systems. In the current context, simulation generally refers to interactive case studies performed with a manikin or anatomic device. More recently, simulation has grown to encompass computational simulation: virtual models of physiology and pathophysiology where students can see in a mechanistic setting how tissues and organs interact with one another to respond to changes in their environment. In this manuscript, we discuss how simulation fits into the overall history of medical education, and detail two computational simulation products designed for medical education. The first of these is an acute simulator, JustPhysiology, which reduces the scope of a large model, HumMod, down to a more focused interface. The second is Sycamore, an electronic health record-delivered, real time simulator of patients designed to teach chronic patient care to students. These products represent a new type of tool for medical and allied health students to encourage active learning and integration of basic science knowledge into clinical situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.