Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562707›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

Comparison of optical coherence tomography angiography and narrow-band imaging using a bimodal endoscope.

Lara M Wurster, Simon Kretschmer, Jan Jäger, Fabian Placzek, Laurin Ginner, Wolfgang Drexler, Çağlar Ataman, Rainer A Leitgeb, Hans Zappe

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optical coherence tomography.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lara M WursterMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
Simon KretschmerUniversity of Freiburg, Gisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engi, Germany.
Jan JägerUniversity of Freiburg, Gisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engi, Germany.
Fabian PlaczekMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
Laurin GinnerMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang DrexlerMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
Çağlar AtamanUniversity of Freiburg, Gisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engi, Germany.
Rainer A LeitgebMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
Hans ZappeUniversity of Freiburg, Gisela and Erwin Sick Chair of Micro-optics, Department of Microsystems Engi, Germany.
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present coregistered images of tissue vasculature that allow a direct comparison between the performance of narrow-band imaging (NBI) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Images were generated with a bimodal endomicroscope having a size of 15  ×  2.4  ×  3.3

Indexed as

EndoscopesNarrow Band ImagingTomography, Optical CoherenceCapillariesFluorescein AngiographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMouth Mucosaangiographyendoscopynarrow-band imagingoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID31562707
PMCPMC7010982
OpenAlexW2976614997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.