Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562533›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2020

Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Junjie Yu, Baoyu Guo, Jiangquan Yu, Tian Chen, Xue Han, Quan Niu, Shigao Xu, Zhe Guo, Qun Shi, Xinxin Peng and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predictive factors for prolonged operative time in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones A retrospective cohort study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Infection Prophylaxis in Urological Diagnostic and Surgical Procedures - A narrative review and recommendations.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junjie YuDepartment of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, No. 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.
Baoyu GuoDepartment of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China. 18705990111@163.com.
Jiangquan YuDepartment of ICU, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, No. 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.
Tian ChenDepartment of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Xue HanChina Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Quan NiuDepartment of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Shigao XuDepartment of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, No. 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.
Zhe GuoDepartment of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Qun ShiDepartment of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, No. 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.
Xinxin PengDepartment of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Zhexun DengDepartment of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Penglei YangDepartment of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital · CNDalian Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China grant no. 81402101National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) grant no. 81572702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature search using Pubmed, Embase, and the Chinese SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases was performed to find comparative studies on the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies in PCNL for preventing postoperative sepsis. The last search was conducted on 21 April 2019. All selected articles were reviewed independently by two, and in case of discordance, three reviewers. Summarized unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies.

resultsThirteen independent studies comprising up to 1549 individuals were included. Compared with single dose before anesthesia, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced postoperative sepsis (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.50; P < 0.00001) and fever (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.48; P < 0.0001). But no remarkable difference in sepsis risk between patients with and without postoperative prophylactic antibiotics was detected (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.72-1.97; P = 0.49). And patients receiving postoperative prophylactic antibiotics were at a significantly high risk of fever (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.01-3.05; P = 0.05). Compared with single dose before anesthesia, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced positive pelvic urine (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.54; P = 0.0009) and stone cultures (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25-0.64; P = 0.0001).

conclusionsThe conclusion is drawn that preoperative prophylactic antibiotics indeed lowered the risk of postoperative sepsis and fever, whereas its postoperative use seems unnecessary. Besides, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics reduced positive pelvic urine and stone cultures significantly, which are a risk factor for sepsis. In our meta-analysis, the efficacy of different types of antibiotics and different courses of preoperative antibiotics could not be assessed. To verify the correctness of these conclusions, randomized controlled trials with a larger sample size and more rigorous study design are required.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousHumansPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsSepsisTreatment OutcomeAntibioticsPercutaneous nephrolithotomyProphylaxisSepsis

Identifiers

PMID31562533
OpenAlexW2976893392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.