ArticleBritish dental journal2019
Prevention in the context of caries-related extractions under general anaesthesia: an evaluation of the use of sealants and other preventive care by referring dentists.
Article in British dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do Preventive Programs Reduce the Need for New Sedations for the Treatment of Oral Pathologies in Healthy and Special Health Care Needs Children?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Children requiring a general anaesthetic (GA) for caries-related dental extractions are at high risk of developing new dental caries. It is therefore important to maximise opportunities for prevention.Aim To explore the use and scope for fissure sealants among children requiring caries-related dental extractions under GA and investigate ongoing oral health support following treatment under GA.Methods Service evaluation (baseline at GA and two years later) including dental examination and structured interview questionnaires, involving children (aged five to 15 years) attending Birmingham Dental Hospital for caries-related dental extractions under GA.Results Of 352 children, 62.5% had at least one sound and sealable first permanent molar at the time of the GA (77% of 6-8-year-olds). Of those that could be followed up two years later (39), 5% had clinical evidence of sealants in first permanent molars. Two thirds saw a dentist after the GA and, of these, 85% had received oral hygiene instruction, 77% dietary advice and 15% application of fluoride varnish. One third presented with untreated dentine caries in at least one first permanent molar recorded as sound at baseline.Conclusion There is an unmet need for preventive treatments, particularly sealants, in this high-risk group. The two-year incidence of caries in first permanent molars that are sound at the time of the GA is high. There may be scope for the provision of fissure sealants as part of the GA encounter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.