Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562418›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2019

Interpreting stimulated plasma renin and aldosterone to select physiologically individualized therapy for resistant hypertension: importance of the class of stimulating drugs.

Xiao Huang, Junpei Li, Lishun Liu, Guangliang Chen, Yingping Yi, Ping Li, Yanqing Wu, Yuan Xu, Huihui Bao, Lianbao Yu and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Targeted Delivery of Salusin-α Into Rabbit Carotid Arterial Endothelium Using SonoVue.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of Efficacies of Commonly Used Hypertension Treatment Modalities: A Retrospective Study of 1900 Participants in a Hypertension Clinic.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Xiao HuangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Junpei LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Lishun LiuAdvanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Guangliang ChenCollege of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Yingping YiMedical big data center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yanqing WuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yuan XuMedical big data center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Huihui BaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Lianbao YuQinghua Town Health Center, Wuyuan, China.
Xianhui QinNational Clinical Research Study Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Binyan WangInstitute of Biomedicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Jianping LiDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fan Fan HouNational Clinical Research Study Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yong HuoDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoshu ChengDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China. xiaoshumenfan@126.com.
J David SpenceStroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada. dspence@robarts.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the treatment of resistant hypertension, physiologically individualized therapy based on phenotyping with plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone significantly improves blood pressure control. Patients with a low-renin/low aldosterone (Liddle) phenotype respond best to amiloride, while those with low-renin/high aldosterone respond best to aldosterone antagonists, and those with high renin/high aldosterone (renal phenotype) respond best to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). However, it is important to measure PRA in a stimulated condition to distinguish between low levels due to high salt intake, licorice or nonsteroidal inflammatory drugs and low levels due to suppression by excess aldosterone secretion or renal tubular genetic variants causing retention of salt and water (Liddle phenotype). In the past, both diuretics and angiotensin converting inhibitors (ACEi) have been used for this purpose, and it has been assumed that these classes of drugs are equivalent. In this study of 2896 patients with hypertension, we evaluated that assumption. We found important differences among diuretics alone, ACEi/ARB alone, and ACEi/ARB + diuretics, which all stimulated PRA. However, ACEi/ARB lowers plasma aldosterone, and beta blockers lower PRA. Among patients with systolic pressure ≥ 180 mmHg ± diastolic pressure ≥ 100 mmHg stimulated only by diuretics, the phenotypes were 25% Liddle, 38% IA, 8.7% renal, and 28.3% mixed. In choosing physiologically individualized therapy based on PRA and aldosterone, it is important to consider the classes of stimulating drugs. Phenotypes are best distinguished by taking into account the aldosterone/PRA ratio in addition to the levels of PRA and aldosterone.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAldosteroneAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDiureticsDrug ResistanceDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAldosteroneAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsDiureticsReninAldosteroneAntihypertensive drug classPersonalized medicineReninStimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.