ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2019
Is calcium hydroxide more effective than formocresol or camphor phenol as intracanal disinfectants in acute pulpitis among deciduous teeth?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data sources Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, ScienceDirect, Wiley, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP) databases were searched for articles dating from January 2000 to July 2018. Studies in languages other than English or Chinese were excluded.Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical effectiveness of calcium hydroxide to formocresol or camphor phenol in acute pulpitis of deciduous teeth requiring root canal treatment were included. The primary outcome was clinical effectiveness while the secondary outcome was incidence of endodontic inter-appointment emergencies.Data extraction and synthesis Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts of all studies identified through the search and reviewed full articles against established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Any disagreements between the authors were resolved by consensus or by consulting relevant experts. Risk of bias assessment was carried out using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Clinical effectiveness and incidence of inter-appointment endodontic emergencies were expressed as odds ratio and 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q-test and I2 measurement. Appropriate models were used for meta-analysis based on heterogeneity.Results A total of 16 randomised trials informed the meta-analysis. Clinical effectiveness of calcium hydroxide was compared to formocresol in 12 studies and pooled data indicate that calcium hydroxide was significantly better in terms of clinical effectiveness (OR = 3.37; 95% CI 2.54 to 4.48), and was associated with significantly decreased inter-appointment emergency visits (OR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42) . Calcium hydroxide was compared to camphor phenol in seven studies and was shown to be significantly superior in its clinical effectiveness (OR = 5.50; 95% CI 3.36 to 8.98).Conclusions Limited available evidence suggest calcium hydroixide was superior to formocresol and camphor phenol as intracanal medicaments in the management of acute pulpitis in deciduous teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.