ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2019
Does time pressure impact on dentists' diagnostic performance?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning algorithms enhance the accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of dental caries: a comparative study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Trial
- Australian Dentists' Knowledge of the Consequences of Interpretive Errors in Dental Radiographs and Potential Mitigation Measures.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- Radiodiagnostics of standard orthodontic radiographs-dental and extradental incidental findings : Do we see everything we should see?Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design A randomised blinded crossover trial.Sample selection Forty local primary care dentists in the south west of England were recruited using a variety of methods. Dentists from NHS, mixed practice, private practice and community services were included. Participants were allocated to four balanced experimental test groups of equal numbers. Block randomisation was used for allocation. The principle researcher was blind to which group a participant was from. The trial was completed using a purpose-made weblink which contained a clinical decision-making exercise. The participants repeated the exercise under increasing time pressure.Data analysis Data analysis was performed independently by the principle researcher. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the decisions made were calculated and statistical analysis preformed. This included paired t-tests to assess differences in self-reported stress and difficulty when the exercise was performed under different time constraints. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare differences in the sensitivity and specificity values achieved under the varying time constraints.Results One hundred percent (n = 40) of GDPs who responded to the invitation were eligible and included in the study. Results showed a statistical difference (p <0.001) of both perceived difficulty of the task, and stress experienced when under time pressure. Results showed diagnostic sensitivity to pathological features was significantly worse (p <0.001) under time pressure. Conversely, the specificity of identification of pathology free sites were not affected by the different circumstances.Conclusions Time pressure negatively impacted diagnostic performance and decreased diagnostic sensitivity for all pathological features. Sensitivity to caries-related pathology and periodontal disease-related pathology deteriorated by 40% and 67%, retrospectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31562408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.