Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562408›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2019

Does time pressure impact on dentists' diagnostic performance?

Victoria Cave, Clare Hutchison

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Radiodiagnostics of standard orthodontic radiographs-dental and extradental incidental findings : Do we see everything we should see?Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victoria CaveGlasgow Dental Hospital and School 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK. victoria.cave1@nhs.net.
Clare HutchisonGlasgow Dental Hospital and School 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design A randomised blinded crossover trial.Sample selection Forty local primary care dentists in the south west of England were recruited using a variety of methods. Dentists from NHS, mixed practice, private practice and community services were included. Participants were allocated to four balanced experimental test groups of equal numbers. Block randomisation was used for allocation. The principle researcher was blind to which group a participant was from. The trial was completed using a purpose-made weblink which contained a clinical decision-making exercise. The participants repeated the exercise under increasing time pressure.Data analysis Data analysis was performed independently by the principle researcher. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the decisions made were calculated and statistical analysis preformed. This included paired t-tests to assess differences in self-reported stress and difficulty when the exercise was performed under different time constraints. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare differences in the sensitivity and specificity values achieved under the varying time constraints.Results One hundred percent (n = 40) of GDPs who responded to the invitation were eligible and included in the study. Results showed a statistical difference (p <0.001) of both perceived difficulty of the task, and stress experienced when under time pressure. Results showed diagnostic sensitivity to pathological features was significantly worse (p <0.001) under time pressure. Conversely, the specificity of identification of pathology free sites were not affected by the different circumstances.Conclusions Time pressure negatively impacted diagnostic performance and decreased diagnostic sensitivity for all pathological features. Sensitivity to caries-related pathology and periodontal disease-related pathology deteriorated by 40% and 67%, retrospectively.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDentistsEnglandHumansRetrospective StudiesTime

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.