Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562397›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2020

Pre-emptive rituximab treatment for Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a worthwhile strategy in high-risk recipients: a comparative study for immune recovery and clinical outcomes.

Nicolas Stocker, Myriam Labopin, Inès Boussen, Olivier Paccoud, Agnès Bonnin, Florent Malard, Corinne Amiel, Joël Gozlan, Giorgia Battipaglia, Rémy Duléry and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acute graft-versus-host disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas StockerSorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), 75012, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7316-5832
Myriam LabopinAP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service d'Hématologie Clinique Et Thérapie Cellulaire, 75012, Paris, France.
Inès BoussenSorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), 75012, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7816-0694
Olivier PaccoudSorbonne Université, Service Des Maladies Infectieuses, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Agnès BonninAP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service d'Hématologie Clinique Et Thérapie Cellulaire, 75012, Paris, France.
Florent MalardSorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), 75012, Paris, France.
Corinne AmielAP-HP, Service de Virologie, Hôpital Tenon, 75020, Paris, France.
Joël GozlanSorbonne Université, Service de Virologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Giorgia BattipagliaSorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), 75012, Paris, France.
Rémy DuléryAP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service d'Hématologie Clinique Et Thérapie Cellulaire, 75012, Paris, France.
Federica GiannottiAP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service d'Hématologie Clinique Et Thérapie Cellulaire, 75012, Paris, France.
Annalisa RuggeriAP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service d'Hématologie Clinique Et Thérapie Cellulaire, 75012, Paris, France.
Béatrice GauglerSorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), 75012, Paris, France.
Mohamad MohtySorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), 75012, Paris, France.
Eolia BrissotSorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), 75012, Paris, France. eolia.brissot@aphp.fr.
Sorbonne Université · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated the impact of a pre-emptive rituximab (RTX) strategy for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation on immune recovery and outcomes of 219 high-risk recipients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for hematological malignancies or bone marrow failure. One-hundred and seven patients received pre-emptive RTX for EBV reactivation (RTX group) and 112 did not (control group). The median onset time of EBV reactivation was 49 days (range, 14-561), including five patients who developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD). RTX and control groups were pair-matched to assess the impact of RTX on all endpoints. In RTX patients, CD19 + B cells were significantly decreased until 1-year post-transplant, so were immunoglobulin levels. Twenty-one patients (17%) developed RTX-related neutropenia. There was, in the RTX group, a trend towards a lower cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (P = 0.059). Overall survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence, and incidence of overall infections at 2 years following allo-SCT were comparable in the two groups. We conclude that pre-emptive RTX, despite inducing a delayed B-cell reconstitution and a high risk of RTX-related neutropenia, may be considered as a worthwhile treatment, given the absence of negative impact on post allo-SCT outcomes and a low incidence of EBV-PTLD.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphoproliferative DisordersHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesRituximabRituximab

Identifiers

PMID31562397
OpenAlexW2975840066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.