Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562327›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Ecological changes over 90 years at Low Isles on the Great Barrier Reef.

Maoz Fine, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Efrat Meroz-Fine, Sophie Dove

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maoz FineThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, 52900, Ramat-Gan, Israel. maoz.fine@biu.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4911-4562
Ove Hoegh-GuldbergSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7510-6713
Efrat Meroz-FineThe Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, P.O. Box 469, 8810300, Eilat, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-4703
Sophie DoveSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUBar-Ilan University · ILInteruniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs are under increasing stress from local and global factors. Long-term perspectives are becoming increasingly important for understanding ecosystem responses. Here, we provide insights from a 91-year study of the Low Isles on the northern Great Barrier Reef (GBR) that begins with the pioneering Great Barrier Reef Expedition (1928-29). We show that intertidal communities have experienced major phase-shifts since 1928, with few signs of a return to the initial state. Coral communities demolished by cyclones 50 years ago and exposed to multiple stressors have yet to recover. Richness and diversity of these communities systematically declined for corals and other invertebrates. Specifically, massive corals have replaced branching corals, and soft corals have become much more numerous. The long-term perspective of this study illustrates the importance of considering multiple factors in reef decline, and potential recovery, of coral reefs, and the importance of tracking changes in community structure as well as coral abundance over long periods.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsEcosystemAnimalsAnthozoaBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcologyInvertebratesPacific Ocean

Identifiers

PMID31562327
PMCPMC6765017
OpenAlexW2975710566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.