Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562251›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2019

Stephanie E Mohr, Norbert Perrimon

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Insects · 2024
    Review
  3. Evolutionary formation of melatonin and vitamin D in early life forms: insects take centre stage.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Modeling neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders in theLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Enhanced Protein-Protein Interaction Discovery via AlphaFold-Multimer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Modeling Neurodegenerative Disorders inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie E MohrDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-7708
Norbert PerrimonDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA perrimon@genetics.med.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7542-472X

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Deborah J Goff · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
New collections of dsRNAs and overexpression miRNA constructs to supplement RNAiR01GM067761 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2003 to 2019
$15.5M
Drosophila resources for modeling human diseasesR24OD021997 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067761NIH HHS R24 OD021997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding human gene function is fundamental to understanding and treating diseases. Research using the model organism

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleMaleMitochondriaNeoplasmsOrganogenesisSex CharacteristicsSugarsWaterSugarsWater

Identifiers

PMID31562251
PMCPMC6826030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.