Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562117›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019

Use of fenofibrate on cardiovascular outcomes in statin users with metabolic syndrome: propensity matched cohort study.

Nam Hoon Kim, Ki Hoon Han, Jimi Choi, Juneyoung Lee, Sin Gon Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Diabetes · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Lipid metabolism, microglia, and stroke.Neural regeneration research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Fibrates : Do They Still Have a Role in Therapy in 2025?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nam Hoon KimDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 126-1, Anam-dong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea k50367@korea.ac.kr.
Ki Hoon HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jimi ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Juneyoung LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sin Gon KimDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 126-1, Anam-dong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea k50367@korea.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-7430-3675
Korea University · KRUlsan University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether fenofibrate as add-on to statin treatment reduce persistent cardiovascular risk in adults with metabolic syndrome in a real world setting.

designPropensity matched cohort study.

settingPopulation based cohort in Korea.

participants29 771 adults with metabolic syndrome (≥40 years) receiving statin treatment. 2156 participants receiving combined treatment (statin plus fenofibrate) were weighted based on propensity score in a 1:5 ratio with 8549 participants using statin only treatment.

main outcome measurePrimary outcome was composite cardiovascular events including incident coronary heart disease, ischaemic stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes.

resultsThe incidence rate per 1000 person years of composite cardiovascular events was 17.7 (95% confidence interval 14.4 to 21.8) in the combined treatment group and 22.0 (20.1 to 24.1) in the statin group. The risk of composite cardiovascular events was significantly reduced in the combined treatment group compared with statin group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.93; P=0.01). The significance was maintained in the on-treatment analysis (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.92; P=0.02). The risk of incident coronary heart disease, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death was lower in the combined treatment group than statin group but was not significant. Participant characteristics did not appear to be associated with the low risk of composite cardiovascular events with combined treatment.

conclusionIn this propensity weighted cohort study of adults with metabolic syndrome, the risk of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower with fenofibrate as add-on to statin treatment than with statin treatment alone.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAdultAgedCause of DeathCohort StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFenofibrateHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareFenofibrateHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31562117
PMCPMC6763755
OpenAlexW2977054874

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.