ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2020
Measurement of Viscoelastic Material Model Parameters Using Fractional Derivative Group Shear Wave Speeds in Simulation and Phantom Data.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shear wave elastography primer for the abdominal radiologist.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Application of mean maximum Young's modulus value as a new parameter for differential diagnosis of prostate diseases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Toward widespread use of virtual trials in medical imaging innovation and regulatory science.Medical physics · 2024Review
- Feasibility of Phase Velocity Imaging Using Multi Frequency Oscillation-Shear Wave Elastography.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
- Layer-specific ultrasound elastography using a multi-layered shear wave dispersion model for assessing the viscoelastic properties.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- A parametric evaluation of shear wave speeds estimated with time-of-flight calculations in viscoelastic media.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Why Are Viscosity and Nonlinearity Bound to Make an Impact in Clinical Elastographic Diagnosis?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While ultrasound shear wave elastography originally focused on tissue stiffness under the assumption of elasticity, recent work has investigated the higher order, viscoelastic properties of the tissue. This article presents a method to use group shear wave speeds (gSWSs) at a series of derivative orders to characterize viscoelastic materials. This method uses a least squares fitting algorithm to match the experimental data to the calculated gSWS data, using an assumed material model and excitation geometry matched to the experimental imaging configuration. Building on a previous study that used particle displacement, velocity, and acceleration signals, this study extends the analysis to a continuous range of fractional derivative orders between 0 and 2. The method can be applied to any material model. Herein, material characterization was performed for three different two-parameter models and three different three-parameter models. This group speed-based method was applied to both shear wave simulations with ultrasonic tracking and experimental acquisitions in viscoelastic phantoms [similar to the Phase II Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) phantoms]. In both the cases, the group speed method produced more repeatable characterization overall than fitting the phase velocity results from the peak of the 2-D Fourier transform. Results suggest that the linear attenuation model is a better fit than the Voigt model for the viscoelastic QIBA phantoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.