Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31562024›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2019

Effect of infectious disease consultation on mortality and treatment of patients with candida bloodstream infections: a retrospective, cohort study.

Carlos Mejia-Chew, Jane A O'Halloran, Margaret A Olsen, Dustin Stwalley, Ryan Kronen, Charlotte Lin, Ana S Salazar, Lindsey Larson, Kevin Hsueh, William G Powderly and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of a pharmacist-led infectious disease support team on candidemia bundle adherence and 28-day mortality: a single-center retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Requirements for the rational use of antibiotics based on antibiotic stewardship].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Treatment ofAJOG global reports · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carlos Mejia-ChewDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jane A O'HalloranDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Margaret A OlsenDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Dustin StwalleyDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Ryan KronenDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Charlotte LinDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Ana S SalazarDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Lindsey LarsonDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Kevin HsuehDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
William G PowderlyDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Andrej SpecDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: andrejspec@wustl.edu.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS ADMINISTRATIVE DATA REPOSITORYR24HS019455 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, VICTORIA J. · 2010 to 2010
$969k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS019455NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandida bloodstream infection is associated with high mortality. Infectious disease consultation improves outcomes in several infections, including Staphylococcus aureus and cryptococcosis, as well as multidrug-resistant organisms. We aimed to examine the association between infectious disease consultation and differences in management with mortality in candida bloodstream infections.

methodsIn this retrospective, single-centre cohort study, we reviewed the medical charts of all patients admitted to Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St Louis, MO, USA), a tertiary referral centre, aged 18 years or older with candida bloodstream infection from 2002 to 2015. We collected data for demographics, comorbidities, predisposing factors, all-cause mortality, antifungal use, central-line removal, and ophthalmological and echocardiographic evaluation to assess 90-day all-cause mortality between individuals with and without an infectious disease consultation. For the survival analysis we used Cox proportional hazards model with inverse weighting by propensity score to assess the effects of infectious disease consultation on mortality and differences in management.

findingsBetween Jan 1, 2002, and Dec 31, 2015, of 1794 patients assessed for eligibility, we analysed 1691 patients with candida bloodstream infection; 776 (45·9%) who had an infectious disease consultation and 915 (54·1%) who did not have an infectious disease consultation. All 1691 patients were included in the analysis. None were missing data. Most underlying comorbidities were evenly distributed between groups. 90-day mortality was lower in the infectious disease consultation group than in patients who did not receive an infectious disease consultation (29% [222/776] vs 51% [468/915]; p<0·0001). In the model with inverse weighting by the propensity score, infectious disease consultation was associated with a hazard ratio of 0·81 (95% CI 0·73-0·91; p<0·0001) for mortality. In the consultation group, median duration of antifungal therapy was longer (18 [IQR 14-35] vs 14 [6-20] days; p<0·0001) and central-line removal (587 [76%] of 776 vs 538 [59%] of 915; p<0·0001), echocardiography use (442 [57%] of 776 vs 305 [33%] of 915; p<0·0001), and ophthalmological examination (412 [53%] of 776 vs 160 [17%] of 915; p<0·0001) were more frequently done. Fewer patients in the infectious disease consultation group were not treated (13 [2%] of 776 vs 128 [14%] of 915; p<0·0001).

interpretationPatients with candida bloodstream infection receiving an infectious disease consultation have lower mortality. This finding might be attributable to these individuals receiving a higher number of non-pharmacological, evidence-based interventions and lower amounts of non-treatment. These data suggest that an infectious disease consultation should be an integral part of clinical care of patients with candida bloodstream infection.

fundingAstellas Global Development Pharma, Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Indexed as

CandidaReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedCandidemiaCandidiasisComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31562024
PMCPMC7014922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.