SynthesisVaccine2019
Beliefs around childhood vaccines in the United States: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- A taxonomy of anti-vaccination arguments from a systematic literature review and text modelling.Nature human behaviour · 2023Pooled it
- A taxonomy of anti-vaccination arguments from a systematic literature review and text modelling.Nature human behaviour · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- The impact of empowering community physicians to prescribe vaccines on public vaccination: a grounded theory interview study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Confidence in the efficacy of routine vaccines after the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional web-based study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Factors associated with HPV vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in Africa: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine development: advancements and challenges.Molecular biomedicine · 2024Review
- Socio-demographic factors affecting the first and second dose of measles vaccination status among under-five children: Perspectives from South Asian countries.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- The Impact of Motivational Interviewing and MOTIVE Tool Use by Pharmacists on Vaccine Acceptance.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of social determinants and medical mistrust on parent-child HPV vaccination in economically disadvantaged communities: implications for cancer prevention.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Exploring social media influences on vaccine decision-making in parents: a netnography.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2024Article
- Factors in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in five racial/ethnic Colorado communities: A report from the Colorado CEAL project.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Attitudes toward COVID-19 and Other Vaccines: Comparing Parents to Other Adults, September 2022.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with vaccine hesitancy - results from a longitudinal study in Singapore.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Psychological profiles of anti-vaccination argument endorsement.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Understanding medical mistrust and HPV vaccine hesitancy among multiethnic parents in Los Angeles.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Promoting HPV vaccination among Latinx: an application of the extended parallel processing model.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile childhood vaccines are safe and effective, some parents remain hesitant to vaccinate their children, which has led to outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. The goal of this systematic review was to identify and summarize the range of beliefs around childhood vaccines elicited using open-ended questions, which are better suited for discovering beliefs compared to closed-ended questions.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched using keywords for childhood vaccines, decision makers, beliefs, and attitudes to identify studies that collected primary data using a variety of open-ended questions regarding routine childhood vaccine beliefs in the United States. Study designs, population characteristics, vaccine types, and vaccine beliefs were abstracted. We conducted a qualitative analysis to conceptualize beliefs into themes and generated descriptive statistics.
resultsOf 1727 studies identified, 71 were included, focusing largely on parents (including in general, and those who were vaccine hesitant or at risk of hesitancy). Seven themes emerged: Adverse effects was most prominent, followed by mistrust, perceived lack of necessity, pro-vaccine opinions, skepticism about effectiveness, desire for autonomy, and morality concerns. The most commonly described beliefs included that vaccines can cause illnesses; a child's immune system can be overwhelmed if receiving too many vaccines at once; vaccines contain harmful ingredients; younger children are more susceptible to vaccine adverse events; the purpose of vaccines is profit-making; and naturally developed immunity is better than that acquired from vaccines. Nearly a third of the studies exclusively assessed minority populations, and more than half of the studies examined beliefs only regarding HPV vaccine.
conclusionsFew studies used open-ended questions to elicit beliefs about vaccines. Many of the studies that did so, focused on HPV vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety were the most commonly stated beliefs about childhood vaccines, likely because studies were designed to capture barriers and challenges to vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.