Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31561524›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Correlation Analysis and Verification of Railway Crossing Condition Monitoring.

X Liu, V L Markine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

X LiuSection of Railway Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands. Xiangming.Liu@tudelft.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2879-9996
V L MarkineSection of Railway Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands. V.L.Markine@tudelft.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a correlation analysis of the structural dynamic responses and weather conditions of a railway crossing. Prior to that, the condition monitoring of the crossing as well as the indicators for crossing condition assessment are briefly introduced. In the correlation analysis, strong correlations are found between acceleration responses with irregular contact ratios and the fatigue area. The correlation results between the dynamic responses and weather variables indicate the influence of weather on the performance of the crossing, which is verified using a numerical vehicle-crossing model developed using the multi-body system (MBS) method. The combined correlation and simulation results also indicate degraded track conditions of the monitored crossing. In the condition monitoring of railway crossings, the findings of this study can be applied to data measurement simplification and regression, as well as to assessing the conditions of railway crossings.

Indexed as

condition indicatorcondition monitoringcorrelation analysisnumerical verificationrailway crossingweather impact

Identifiers

PMID31561524
PMCPMC6806185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.