Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31561488›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comprehensive Clinical Approach to Reducing Suicidal Ideation, Attempts, and Deaths.

David A Jobes, Samantha A Chalker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05583279 (Implementation of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy in Juvenile Justice to Reduce Self-Harm and Increase Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05583279 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy in Juvenile Justice to Reduce Self-Harm and Increase Quality of Life: A Pilot Test

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Catholic University of AmericaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsNon-Suicidal Self Injury, Suicide, Self-harm, Emotion RegulationArmsDialetical Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding for Prevention: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Suicide Notes and Forensic Reports.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Scoping Review: Suicide Specific Intervention Programmes for People Experiencing Homelessness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David A JobesDepartment of Psychology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA. jobes@cua.edu.
Samantha A ChalkerDepartment of Psychology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA. 97chalker@cua.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9523-4197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the existence of mental illness has been documented for centuries, the understanding and treatment of such illnesses has evolved considerably over time. Ritual exorcisms and locking mentally ill patients in asylums have been fundamentally replaced by the use of psychotropic medications and evidence-based psychological practices. Yet the historic roots of mental health management and care has left a certain legacy. With regard to suicidal risk, the authors argue that suicidal patients are by definition seen as mentally ill and out of control, which demands hospitalization and the treatment of the mental disorder (often using a medication-only approach). Notably, however, the evidence for inpatient care and a medication-only approach for suicidal risk is either limited or totally lacking. Thus, the "one-size-fits-all" approach to treating suicidal risk needs to be re-considered in lieu of the evolving evidence base. To this end, the authors highlight a series of evidence-based considerations for suicide-focused clinical care, culminating in a stepped care public health model for optimal clinical of suicidal risk that is cost-effective, least-restrictive, and evidence-based.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesSuicidestepped caresuicidal risksuicide-focused clinical care

Identifiers

PMID31561488
PMCPMC6801408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.