Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31560684›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2019

Evaluation of approaches to strengthen civil registration and vital statistics systems: A systematic review and synthesis of policies in 25 countries.

Amitabh Bipin Suthar, Aleya Khalifa, Sherry Yin, Kristen Wenz, Doris Ma Fat, Samuel Lantei Mills, Erin Nichols, Carla AbouZahr, Srdjan Mrkic

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Strengthening Civil Registration Through Grassroots Health Institutions in India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Improving the measurement of adult mortality.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  7. The role of mortality surveillance in pandemic preparedness and response.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Automated coding and selection of causes of death in Peru: a descriptive study, 2016-2019.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2023
    Article
  16. Comparison of primary liver cancer mortality estimates from World Health Organization, global burden disease and global cancer observatory.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022
    Article
  17. A Novel Block Chain Method for Urban Digitization Governance in Birth Registration Field: A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amitabh Bipin SutharCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-6593
Aleya KhalifaCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8234-1295
Sherry YinCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Kristen WenzProgramme Division, United Nations Children's Fund, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4267-0809
Doris Ma FatHealth Statistics and Informatics Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-5799
Samuel Lantei MillsHealth, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice, World Bank Group, Washington DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-1463
Erin NicholsNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Carla AbouZahrBloomberg Data for Health Initiative, New York City, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7421-7884
Srdjan MrkicStatistics Division, United Nations, New York City, New York, United States of America.

Funding

PEPFARWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCivil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems play a key role in upholding human rights and generating data for health and good governance. They also can help monitor progress in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Although many countries have made substantial progress in strengthening their CRVS systems, most low- and middle-income countries still have underdeveloped systems. The objective of this systematic review is to identify national policies that can help countries strengthen their systems. METHODS AND

findingsThe ABI/INFORM, Embase, JSTOR, PubMed, and WHO Index Medicus databases were systematically searched for policies to improve birth and/or death registration on 24 January 2017. Global stakeholders were also contacted for relevant grey literature. For the purposes of this review, policies were categorised as supply, demand, incentive, penalty, or combination (i.e., at least two of the preceding policy approaches). Quantitative results on changes in vital event registration rates were presented for individual comparative articles. Qualitative systematic review methodology, including meta-ethnography, was used for qualitative syntheses on operational considerations encompassing acceptability to recipients and staff, human resource requirements, information technology or infrastructure requirements, costs to the health system, unintended effects, facilitators, and barriers. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018085768. Thirty-five articles documenting experience in implementing policies to improve birth and/or death registration were identified. Although 25 countries representing all global regions (Africa, the Americas, Southeast Asia, the Western Pacific, Europe, and the Eastern Mediterranean) were reflected, there were limited countries from the Eastern Mediterranean and Europe regions. Twenty-four articles reported policy effects on birth and/or death registration. Twenty-one of the 24 articles found that the change in registration rate after the policy was positive, with two supply and one penalty articles being the exceptions. The qualitative syntheses identified 15 operational considerations across all policy categories. Human and financial resource requirements were not quantified. The primary limitation of this systematic review was the threat of publication bias wherein many countries may not have documented their experience; this threat is most concerning for policies that had neutral or negative effects.

conclusionsOur systematic review suggests that combination policy approaches, consisting of at least a supply and demand component, were consistently associated with improved registration rates in different geographical contexts. Operational considerations should be interpreted based on health system, governance, and sociocultural context. More evaluations and research are needed from the Eastern Mediterranean and Europe regions. Further research and evaluation are also needed to estimate the human and financial resource requirements required for different policies.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyHuman RightsPolicy MakingRegistriesVital StatisticsData CollectionHumansPopulation SurveillancePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID31560684
PMCPMC6764661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.