Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31560581›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: When Adoption of a Novel Treatment Precedes Prospective, Randomized Evidence.

Alexander Melamed, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Pedro T Ramirez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. [Evidence for robotics in oncological pancreatic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. [Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery for primary treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: randomisation decides].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander MelamedColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
J Alejandro Rauh-HainThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Pedro T RamirezThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Funding

Obstetrical and Oncological Outcomes Among Reproductive Age Women with Gynecological and Breast CancerK08CA234333 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RAUH-HAIN, JOSE ALEJANDRO · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansHysterectomyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31560581
PMCPMC6864845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.