ArticleJAMA network open2019
Association of a Comprehensive Smoking Cessation Program With Smoking Abstinence Among Patients With Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Smoking Cessation Interventions for Smokers Diagnosed with Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacological Interventions for Electronic Cigarette Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.Journal of addiction medicinePooled it
- Smoking Cessation Interventions in the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Trial
- A qualitative study of attitudes and perceptions of smoking cessation medication among patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Trial
- Bupropion XL and SR have similar effectiveness and adverse event profiles when used to treat smoking among patients at a comprehensive cancer center.The American journal on addictions · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- Trial
- An Implementation Trial to Improve Tobacco Treatment for Cancer Patients: Patient Preferences, Treatment Acceptability and Effectiveness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Personal pathways to success: an innovative program to overcome cancer patient barriers to tobacco cessation and promote patient participation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Survival among US adults with post-cancer-diagnosis cigarette smoking cessation.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Supportive Care Needs Among Pretreatment Head and Neck Cancer Patients According to Smoking Status: A Cross-Sectional Study With Nested Analyses.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Reach, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Proactive Outreach and Varenicline with Cancer-Focused Counseling for Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.JCO oncology advances · 2026Article
- Real-world comparison of phone versus video consultation in a tobacco treatment program during the COVID-19 pandemic.Patient education and counseling · 2025Article
- Tobacco Free Hiring at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025Article
- Motivating smoking cessation among patients with cancers not perceived as smoking-related: a targeted intervention.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Effective smoking cessation interventions in people with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2025Review
- Comparing the Fagerström Test and Heaviness of Smoking Index in Predicting Smoking Abstinence in Cancer Patients.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024Article
- Examining the Association between Abstinence from Smoking and Healthcare Costs among Patients with Cancer.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Smoking cessation assistance among pneumologists and thoracic surgeons in Switzerland: a national survey.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Implementation planning for equitable tobacco treatment services: a mixed methods assessment of contextual facilitators and barriers in a large comprehensive cancer center.Translational behavioral medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Patients with cancer who smoke after diagnosis risk experiencing reductions in treatment effectiveness, survival rates, and quality of life, and increases in complications, cancer recurrence, and second primary cancers. Smoking cessation can significantly affect these outcomes, but to date comprehensive treatment is not widely implemented in the oncologic setting. Objectives: To describe a potential model tobacco treatment program (TTP) implemented in a cancer setting, report on its long-term outcomes, and highlight its importance to quality patient care. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort of smokers was treated in the TTP at a comprehensive cancer center from January 1, 2006, to August 31, 2015. Data analysis was performed from November 2017 to December 2018. Participants included 3245 patients (2343 with current cancer; 309 with previous cancer; 593 with no cancer history) drawn from a population of 5061 smokers referred for treatment in the TTP. Reasons for exclusion included follow-up for a noncancerous disease, no medical consultation, smoked less than 1 cigarette per day; or died before the 9-month follow-up. Exposures: Treatment consisted of an in-person medical consultation, 6 to 8 in-person and telephone follow-up counseling sessions, and 10 to 12 weeks of pharmacotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was 9-month 7-day point-prevalence abstinence evaluated using time-specific (3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups) and longitudinal covariate-adjusted and unadjusted regression models with multiple imputation, intention-to-treat, and respondent-only approaches to missing data. The Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence was used as a measure of dependence (possible range, 0-10; higher numbers indicate greater dependence). Results: Of the 3245 smokers, 1588 (48.9%) were men, 322 (9.9%) were of black race/ethnicity, 172 (5.3%) were of Hispanic race/ethnicity, and 2498 (76.0%) were of white race/ethnicity. Mean (SD) age was 54 (11.4) years; Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence score, 4.41 (2.2), number of cigarettes smoked per day, 17.1 (10.7); years smoked, 33 (13.2); and 1393 patients (42.9%) had at least 1 psychiatric comorbidity. Overall self-reported abstinence was 45.1% at 3 months, 45.8% at 6 months, and 43.7% at 9 months in the multiply imputed sample. Results across all models were consistent, suggesting that, in comparison with smokers with no cancer history, abstinence rates within this TTP program did not differ appreciably whether smokers had current cancer, were a cancer survivor, or had smoking-related cancers, with the exception of patients with head and neck cancer; the rates were higher at 9 months (relative risk, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.56; P = .001) and in longitudinal models (relative risk, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.42; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, mean smoking abstinence rates did not differ significantly between patients with cancer and those without cancer. These findings suggest that providing comprehensive tobacco treatment in the oncologic setting can result in sustained high abstinence rates for all patients with cancer and survivors and should be included as standard of care to ensure the best possible cancer treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.