Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31560384›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Health System and Beneficiary Costs Associated With Intensive End-of-Life Medical Services.

Risha Gidwani-Marszowski, Steven M Asch, Vincent Mor, Todd H Wagner, Katherine Faricy-Anderson, Samantha Illarmo, Gary Hsin, Manali I Patel, Kavitha Ramchandran, Karl A Lorenz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Missed opportunities: delayed in-hospital palliative care consultations in patients with non-metastatic cancers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Dyadic-concordance death-preparedness states and end-of-life care received by cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. End-of-Life Systemic Oncologic Treatment in the Immunotherapy Era: The Role of Race, Insurance, and Practice Setting.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Associations of prognostic-awareness-transition patterns with end-of-life care in cancer patients' last month.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Exploratory Study of Palliative Care Utilization and Medical Expense for Inpatients at the End-of-Life.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Risha Gidwani-MarszowskiHealth Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Steven M AschCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Vincent MorDepartment of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Todd H WagnerHealth Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Katherine Faricy-AndersonProvidence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
Samantha IllarmoHealth Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Gary HsinDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Manali I PatelVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Kavitha RamchandranDivision of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Karl A LorenzCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Jack NeedlemanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX001627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite recommendations to reduce intensive medical treatment at the end of life, many patients with cancer continue to receive such services. Objective: To quantify expected beneficiary and health system costs incurred in association with receipt of intensive medical services in the last month of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data collected nationally from Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration for care provided in fiscal years 2010 to 2014. Participants were 48 937 adults aged 66 years or older who died of solid tumor and were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration in the 12 months prior to death. The data were analyzed from February to August 2019. Exposures: American Society of Clinical Oncology metrics regarding medically intensive services provided in the last month of life, including hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, chemotherapy, 2 or more emergency department visits, or hospice for 3 or fewer days. Main Outcomes and Measures: Costs in the last month of life associated with receipt of intensive medical services were evaluated for both beneficiaries and the health system. Costs were estimated from generalized linear models, adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities and conditioning on geographic region. Results: Of 48 937 veterans who received care through the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare, most were white (90.8%) and male (98.9%). More than half (58.9%) received at least 1 medically intensive service in the last month of life. Patients who received no medically intensive service generated a mean (SD) health system cost of $7660 ($1793), whereas patients who received 1 or more medically intensive services generated a mean (SD) health system cost of $23 612 ($5528); thus, the additional financial consequence to the health care system for medically intensive services was $15 952 (95% CI, $15 676-$16 206; P < .001). The biggest contributor to these differences was $21 093 (95% CI, $20 364-$21 689) for intensive care unit stay, while the smallest contributor was $3460 (95% CI, $2927-$3880) for chemotherapy. Mean (SD) expected beneficiary costs for the last month of life were $133 ($50) for patients with no medically intensive service and $1257 ($408) for patients with at least 1 medically intensive service (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Given the low income of many elderly patients in the United States, the financial consequences of medically intensive services may be substantial. Costs of medically intensive services at the end of life, including patient financial consequences, should be considered by both physicians and families.

Indexed as

MedicareAgedCost of IllnessFee-for-Service PlansFemaleFinancing, PersonalHealth ExpendituresHospice CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID31560384
PMCPMC6777391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.