Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31560137›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2019

Evaluation of benazepril in cats with heart disease in a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Jonathan N King, Mike Martin, Valérie Chetboul, Luca Ferasin, Anne T French, Günther Strehlau, Wolfgang Seewald, Sarah G W Smith, Simon T Swift, Susan L Roberts and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Feline Cardiomyopathies: 2. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Jonathan N KingElanco Animal Health, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4194-9015
Mike MartinMike Martin Consultancy, Kenilworth, United Kingdom.
Valérie ChetboulEcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-1814
Luca FerasinLumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Alton, United Kingdom.
Anne T FrenchSmall Animal Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Günther StrehlauFreiburg, Germany.
Wolfgang SeewaldElanco Animal Health, Basel, Switzerland.
Sarah G W SmithSarah Smith Cardiology, Derby, United Kingdom.
Simon T SwiftCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Susan L RobertsSLR Cardiology Referrals, Hebden Bridge, United Kingdom.
Andrea M HarveyUniversity of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Christopher J L LittleBarton Veterinary Hospital, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Sarah M A CaneyVet Professionals Ltd, Roslin, United Kingdom.
Kerry E SimpsonRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine, St Kitts.
Andrew H SparkesFeline Veterinary Consultancy, Shaftesbury, United Kingdom.
Eleanor J MardellChestergates Veterinary Specialists CVS (UK) Ltd, Chester, United Kingdom.
Eric BomassiCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire des Cordeliers Meaux, Meaux, France.
Claude MullerClinique Vétérinaire Saint Bernard, Lomme, France.
John P SauvageEgerton, United Kingdom.
Armelle DiquélouIRSD, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, INRA, ENVT, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Matthias A SchneiderUniversity of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Laurence J BrownAshby Vet Group, Scunthorpe, United Kingdom.
David D ClarkeKings-Lynn, United Kingdom.
Jean-Francois RousselotClinique Vétérinaire du Clos des Camélias, Colombes, France.
Elanco (United States) · USBuilding Bridges · USCanterbury Hospital · AUCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers · FRClinique Claude-Bernard · FRClinique Vétérinaire Benjamin Franklin · FRCollege of West Anglia · GBÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FREgerton University · KEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DERoslin Cells (United Kingdom) · GBRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine · KNSci-Tech Daresbury · GBScunthorpe General Hospital · GBSmith Family · AUUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity of Chester · GBUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

Novartis Animal Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cats, but there is limited evidence of the benefit of any medication. HYPOTHESIS: The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril would delay the time to treatment failure in cats with heart disease of various etiologies. ANIMALS: One hundred fifty-one client-owned cats.

methodsCats with heart disease, confirmed by echocardiography, with or without clinical signs of congestive heart failure, were recruited between 2002 and 2005 and randomized to benazepril or placebo in a prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, blinded clinical trial. Benazepril (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) or placebo was administered PO once daily for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was treatment failure. Analyses were conducted separately for all-cause treatment failure (main analysis) and heart disease-related treatment failure (supportive analysis).

resultsNo benefit of benazepril versus placebo was detected for time to all-cause treatment failure (P = .42) or time to treatment failure related to heart disease (P = .21). Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) from multivariate analysis for benazepril compared with placebo were 1.00 (0.57-1.74) for all-cause failure, and 0.99 (0.50-1.94) for forward selection and 0.93 (0.48-1.81) for bidirectional selection models for heart disease-related failure. There were no significant differences between groups over time after administration of the test articles in left atrium diameter, left ventricle wall thickness, quality of life scores, adverse events, or plasma biochemistry or hematology variables. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Benazepril was tolerated well in cats with heart disease, but no evidence of benefit was detected.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnimalsBenzazepinesCat DiseasesCatsFemaleHeart DiseasesMaleAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsbenazeprilBenzazepinesACE inhibitorsurvivaltreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID31560137
PMCPMC6872620
OpenAlexW2975989653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.